Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
02-10-2009, 12:59 PM   #16
Pentaxian
Marc Sabatella's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 10,686
QuoteOriginally posted by shiestmiester Quote
My only question is, will I grow tired of the f/4 at 70mm quickly, or is this a good investment for a hobbyist??

Otherwise i'll just save for a DA* 50-135 f/2,8 .... HA
Or, just get a prime to give you fast portrait range options - a cheap manual focus 50 for less than $50, or the FA50, or maybe the DA70/2.4. That plus the Sigma 17-70 should cover quite a lot of shooting situations.

02-10-2009, 09:23 PM   #17
Forum Member
shiestmiester's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 97
Original Poster
Jawn Doe-

Definately love the 50mm f/2 for it's price, and old school feel.

As for a new lens, I think i'm actually going to save for the Sigma 17-70. It's designed for APS sensor so the wide is wide, and the 17mm will me great. Saw some tests and color, contrast looks awesome. I'll be able to put up with the 70mm 4.5 for the 17mm 2.8.

Thanks for all your help guys.

~T

Last edited by shiestmiester; 02-10-2009 at 09:34 PM. Reason: wrong info
02-11-2009, 08:06 AM   #18
Pentaxian
Ratmagiclady's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: GA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 13,476
QuoteOriginally posted by shiestmiester Quote
So it appers as though my options have come to the sigma 2.8-4 28-70, or sigma 2.8 24-70. No Tamron or Pentax comes with same aperature rating and price range.

My only question is, will I grow tired of the f/4 at 70mm quickly, or is this a good investment for a hobbyist??

Otherwise i'll just save for a DA* 50-135 f/2,8 .... HA

~T
For some reason that 2.8-4 was very, very cheap late last year: I'd been considering one to bypass the kit lens with: the speed's a notable improvement there, ...the image quality isn't in the same league as the steady 2.8 versions, but with reviews I saw, it wasn't *terrible* for a lot of walking around purposes, considering the size and all. This is from someone who doesn't tend to expect much from zooms, compared to primes, and also likes the range a 28-70 would cover.

Since I got a free kit lens, as it turned out, I haven't given them much thought. I'll probably end up going with one of the steady-2.8 Tammies.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
k-mount, lens, pentax lens, price, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Possible Solution for Fast, Cheap(er), Normal Prime? Biro Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 3 01-10-2010 03:40 PM
Fast, Normal Primes on a Semi-Budget Biro Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 16 10-31-2009 08:26 AM
the normal zoom problem redpigeons Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 12 09-11-2009 12:23 PM
Fast Normal Prime = Hens Teeth? CDP Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 26 04-22-2007 03:49 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:00 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top