The more I research about these lenses, the harder it is to choose
Should have just bought all the DAs, ignorance is bliss
Originally posted by joelovotti size vs speed and you pay for speed.
There are plenty of passionate photographers on this site that may jump in with strong opinions on this FA or that DA but it will all come down to subtleties.
So are the DAs smaller in size because they lack the speed (ie. more speed = more mechanical issues = more size) or because they are designed for the APC-S sensor so they can make it shorter?
Originally posted by rparmar I've got two FA Limiteds and one DA Limited so that won't help you at all.
which ones are FA and which ones are DA? Why'd it pick it that way?
Originally posted by roentarre I love my Fa limited
those pictures are rediculous. what is taht guy smashing over his head
Originally posted by seacapt If you knowthat this is the only camera you will own...
already kind of wishing that maybe I had gotten a k20d... theres some features that I'm already missing (AF points, pressing the "green button" to get shutter speed in manual etc) that isnt in the k-m. It's so cheap now too... I know for sure that i will want a better camera, but the question is stay apc-s or FF if it ever comes out.
I feel costs aside, if full frame gives better quality images, in the future when the costs will be the same why stay with apc-s? I know I will keep these lenses at least for 5-10 years probably.
Originally posted by Marc Sabatella By "in the 70-100 range", are you meaning to exclude 100mm? The M100/2.8 is on the edge of the range, obviously, but runs only around $100 or so.
By cheap old primes i mean <$50
When is the next camera convention that Pentax could announce their new lineup? I might have to wait for that to see if anything new and crazy comes out