[millertime]

Any reason I wouldn't want to do this?

Edit: Hmm I should have put this in lenses....

[roentarre]

I have directed this thread to SLR section here.

Regarding your question, I do not see any problems with this combination. Or you would have to be more specific with your questions.

[Andi Lo]

i personally fail to see the point of the question. So in a way I'm saying that you should put it on!

[millertime]

Guess i should have been more specific. What I'm wondering is if it's too much lens for the camera. I need a macro lens, and I found a killer deal on this one and it seems like a pretty killer lens. I think I'll go for it.

[farfisa]

Any reason I wouldn't want to do this?

Edit: Hmm I should have put this in lenses....

Do it!

Great lens, and don't underestimate your K2000! It can put out some very fine images.

[millertime]

Thats what I figured, more expensive tools just make it easier to get the job done as someone else phrased it on these forums somewhere. Thanks for the quick advice.

[jsherman999]

Guess i should have been more specific. What I'm wondering is if it's too much lens for the camera. I need a macro lens, and I found a killer deal on this one and it seems like a pretty killer lens. I think I'll go for it.

Too much lens? No way - the K2000/K-M + DA 35ltd macro is almost the perfect combo, in truth. Both are small, and the K-M gives as good IQ as any APS-C camera you can buy at ISO 400 and less.

I loved using my DA35ltd on my K-M:

[Blue]

Is there such thing as too much lens?

Edit: I thought is was more of a "not enough money" situation for some of us.

[paolojackson]

Really like the 2nd pick jsherman

[joelovotti]

Go for the DA35 you will love it.
It's a normal lens, a macro lens, shoots good landscapes. You will get loads of use out of it.
Attachment 28606