Originally posted by Marc Langille @ David W.:actually you can use a 300 for wildlife work, but different technique is needed, and I've used it successfully. The only tough subject is small birds, for obvious reasons. Sometimes even 500mm is tough with the smaller subjects. BTW, where are you in the Ottawa area? I lived at several locales on both sides of the river during my 22 years there... Vanier, Ottawa, Aylmer, Kanata... I wish I could go nordic skiing again - went up to visit family at the end of January...
Hi Marc,
I've been impressed with your shots before; figures you'd turn up in this thread!
Yeah, I wasn't very clear before: I know well you
can do wildlife with just 300mm as I was doing it in southern Africa (no TC) and Galapagos (200 + 1.7 TC; ok so 340mm). But skiing last Sunday, the combo of the situation I was in and my own laziness confirmed why some people will want more.
I live in Gatineau (specifically Hull, specifically Wrightville, Gamelin & St. Joseph) though I used to live in Val Tétreau and really miss being on the river's edge. Sunday I was skiing from Val Tétreau to Aylmer on the riverside bike path. No tripod and only bringing the 300mm 'cause it's new & I didn't want to miss an opportunity to test it out. No expectation of using it & I'm certainly no birder. So to be honest, when ducks out on the river caught my eye, I didn't even do the few meters from the trail to the water's edge to get closer, or wait to see if they'd get closer, or play with aperture settings for DoF, or to see a grouping to create some interesting composition with several birds, or or or... I was with my partner and after 30 seconds she'd had enough of admiring the ducks and not being a birder I just lingered enough to take 4 or 5 imperfectly focused shots & then went off to catch up.
I did only slightly better when the trail went right under some berry-bearing tall bushes that had attracted a large number of waxwings. In that case, I was really glad I wasn't trying to hand-hold anything bigger than the DA*300, and would have had some perfectly useable shots if I had the slightest bit of technique. (As is, they were perfectly useable to identify them after the fact--at the time we were guessing female cardinals as if they stick around Aylmer all winter
) Bracing while aiming so steeply upward wasn't working for me, and in the cold my patience to figure out how to do it better was rather tried. Had I a bit of wits about me, I would have turned ISO up a bit to stop down, used my skipoles or
something to brace against, and cranked out some wicked shots.
Next time.
Also, the SDM motor on the DA*300 didn't seem happy at all in the sub-zero temperatures.
Do people know: is this normal, or should I be worried about my lens? I haven't found anything about operating temperatures for SDM. It was behaving just fine back inside at human temperatures.