Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
03-04-2009, 09:05 PM   #16
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2007
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 8,237
Original Poster
Shootout

.

I meant to post some images in here beyond AF sharpness tests to show what
both lenses can do out in the real world.

So here are some images from each - sorry for the somewhat restricted theme,
my usual shooting haunts are frozen solid.


First, Sigma, followed by DA*.









Last edited by jsherman999; 03-04-2009 at 09:11 PM.
03-04-2009, 09:35 PM   #17
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2007
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 8,237
Original Poster
DA*

.

DA* 50-135 shots:


















03-04-2009, 09:45 PM   #18
Igilligan
Guest




Hi Jay, can you do me a favor... on the first shots where you did the crop on the sign... could you instead crop over on the green/yellow part of the right front leg of the dinosaur on the far left of the pic... it may just be the contrast difference I am seeing in these resized shots. But I would love to see how the sharpness holds up out wide like that.

Thanks a bunch for this post... you do both cameras and lens combos proud... (well, with the exception of the AF sigma close shot....) but the MF look very good to me.

PS A really great real world last series you posted here. It looks like there are some action shots with the sigma/nikon in this series and none really with DA... was that by choice?

Was this ride moving? I think this is a great shot either way

Last edited by Igilligan; 03-04-2009 at 09:54 PM.
03-04-2009, 10:09 PM   #19
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2007
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 8,237
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by Igilligan Quote
Hi Jay, can you do me a favor... on the first shots where you did the crop on the sign... could you instead crop over on the green/yellow part of the right front leg of the dinosaur on the far left of the pic... it may just be the contrast difference I am seeing in these resized shots. But I would love to see how the sharpness holds up out wide like that.
Sure - both are pretty bad at this level of crop.

DA*, followed by Sigma crop:


QuoteQuote:
Thanks a bunch for this post... you do both cameras and lens combos proud... (well, with the exception of the AF sigma close shot....) but the MF look very good to me.

PS A really great real world last series you posted here. It looks like there are some action shots with the sigma/nikon in this series and none really with DA... was that by choice?

Was this ride moving? I think this is a great shot either way
(water ride)

Very astute - Yes, the first ride was moving very fast, the water ride was
moving pretty fast but slowing down.

It's easier to get the action shots with the Nikon/Sigma combo. I bought
the D90 in large part just so I could shoot the Sigma 50-150 HSM - I
need the speed.


.


Last edited by jsherman999; 03-04-2009 at 10:24 PM.
03-04-2009, 10:23 PM   #20
Igilligan
Guest




Thanks Jay

That was fast... much appreciated

Oh, that D90 is calling me for these action kid shots...
1 year and it is an old model, the economy has turned and I have more work.... a boy can dream

Last edited by Igilligan; 03-04-2009 at 10:30 PM.
03-04-2009, 10:24 PM   #21
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 42,007
Jay,
What an interesting thread! The posts with general shots from the D90/Sigma followed by some from the K20D/DA* are pretty telling. The first set has a fairly typical Nikon look. I don't know how to describe it except to say that they almost have too much snap and the contrast seems exagerated. The second grouping just looks more natural to me. Maybe I have just been looking at Pentax images for too long

Steve
03-05-2009, 06:45 AM   #22
New Member




Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Outer Banks, NC
Posts: 15
Jay: What about the size and weight of each lens. I had the 50-135mm in my hands a year back with the lens hood on and it was one big sucker at the end of my camera. I've heard that the 50-150 is lighter and not as long.

03-05-2009, 07:02 AM   #23
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,449
QuoteOriginally posted by jsherman999 Quote
Stephen, I take it you like that 100-300 f/4? I've been reading rave reviews
about it and have seen some images that really impressed me. Normally I
ignore zooms that go beyond 200mm - either too much is compromised optically
or they're way too expensive, but that 100-300 f/4 looks like it makes images as
sharp as a 70-200 2.8, and can be shot wide-open just fine... Is that your
take? Do you have any images uploaded somewhere from it?

It's not cheap, but around a grand for something that long and that good isn't
outrageous.


.
My personal experience with the Sigma 100-300 f4 EX DG is that it is extremely sharp across the spectrum of focal lengths. It is sharp wide open, but like any lens improves with stopping down a little. The lens is large and somewhat heavy, but that is what one should expect from a full frame lens of quality build.

I found that there is absolute minimal reduction in image quality when coupled with the dedicated 1.4X APO exender. The 2X works fine too, but as you might expect there is a little less sharpness, though it is quite usable. I carry the 2X at times but most of the time I will use a Pentax A* 600 or a 645 *600 ED IF as there is no compromise at all there.

While I don't "chart test" most of my lenses, I have to say that while most zooms suffer at the upper end of their range from softness and reduction in contrast, this lens does not appear to succumb to those problems. The focal range is simply fantastic and the fact that it is a fixed f4 across the field is a bonus. I do not find CA's or other zoom distortions to be field relevant. And while I love Pentax lenses and prefer sticking with them, I have sold off my A*300/4 and and K 300/4 and have only kept the A*300/2.8 for the occasional outing.

As to as sharp as the 70-200 2.8 EX DG version. Yes, probably as sharp with the caveat that one must rember that the longer any lenses focal length is, there will always be a reduction in resolution in lines per mm. That is simply a fact with longer focal lengths. They will never resolve like 50mm lens.

Now, I noticed your cereal boxes. Interesting to me is that cyan/blue-green balance in the DA was more neutralized under the low light of the kitchen (?) and the balance fo the Sigma shifted to the red-magenta end. That is why I sometimes pick the lens for the environmental light I am shooting in. I also have a logbook, that I note the lens image casts on every site that have photographed in. Overall, the shift isn't bad and is easily corrected in CS3.

And... from earlier up I assume that you live in Minnesota or nearby Wisconsin. Yeah, winters can be brutal at this time of year. I lived up in North Dakota for seven years. We called the Twin Cities the banana belt because you guys were always soooo much warmer than us.

Stephen
03-05-2009, 08:47 AM   #24
Veteran Member
farfisa's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,274
QuoteOriginally posted by tarheel13 Quote
Jay: What about the size and weight of each lens. I had the 50-135mm in my hands a year back with the lens hood on and it was one big sucker at the end of my camera. I've heard that the 50-150 is lighter and not as long.
Comparing dimensions on the Sigma and Pentax sites, it seems the Sigma 50-150 is 95g heavier and 4mm longer.

Sigma 50-150 for Pentax:
Dimensions
Diameter 76.5mm X Length 139.7mm
3 in. X 5.5 in.
Weight 780g/27.5 oz

Pentax 50-135:
Dimensions: 3.0" x 5.4" (76.5mm x 136mm)
Weight: 24.2 oz. (685g) without hood, 27.0 oz. (765g) with hood
03-05-2009, 10:40 AM   #25
Veteran Member




Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston, PRofMA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,026
The Sigma images still look like they have a lot more "pop" (contrast/color). Any difference in focusing speed in that bright lighting?

Glad mall security isn't hunting you down as a child perv w/ a camera
03-05-2009, 12:52 PM   #26
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2007
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 8,237
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by tarheel13 Quote
Jay: What about the size and weight of each lens. I had the 50-135mm in my hands a year back with the lens hood on and it was one big sucker at the end of my camera. I've heard that the 50-150 is lighter and not as long.
You see the weights in the post above - on the cameras, they look and feel
almost exactly the same, actually, and I don't really notice much of a weight
difference. They both look very 'pro', and I've had other shooters come over
to get a closer look and ask about them.


QuoteOriginally posted by SCGushue Quote
My personal experience with the Sigma 100-300 f4 EX DG is that it is extremely sharp across the spectrum of focal lengths. It is sharp wide open, but like any lens improves with stopping down a little. The lens is large and somewhat heavy, but that is what one should expect from a full frame lens of quality build.

I found that there is absolute minimal reduction in image quality when coupled with the dedicated 1.4X APO exender. The 2X works fine too, but as you might expect there is a little less sharpness, though it is quite usable. I carry the 2X at times but most of the time I will use a Pentax A* 600 or a 645 *600 ED IF as there is no compromise at all there.

While I don't "chart test" most of my lenses, I have to say that while most zooms suffer at the upper end of their range from softness and reduction in contrast, this lens does not appear to succumb to those problems. The focal range is simply fantastic and the fact that it is a fixed f4 across the field is a bonus. I do not find CA's or other zoom distortions to be field relevant. And while I love Pentax lenses and prefer sticking with them, I have sold off my A*300/4 and and K 300/4 and have only kept the A*300/2.8 for the occasional outing.

As to as sharp as the 70-200 2.8 EX DG version. Yes, probably as sharp with the caveat that one must rember that the longer any lenses focal length is, there will always be a reduction in resolution in lines per mm. That is simply a fact with longer focal lengths. They will never resolve like 50mm lens.

Now, I noticed your cereal boxes. Interesting to me is that cyan/blue-green balance in the DA was more neutralized under the low light of the kitchen (?) and the balance fo the Sigma shifted to the red-magenta end. That is why I sometimes pick the lens for the environmental light I am shooting in. I also have a logbook, that I note the lens image casts on every site that have photographed in. Overall, the shift isn't bad and is easily corrected in CS3.

And... from earlier up I assume that you live in Minnesota or nearby Wisconsin. Yeah, winters can be brutal at this time of year. I lived up in North Dakota for seven years. We called the Twin Cities the banana belt because you guys were always soooo much warmer than us.

Stephen
Stephen, excellent, thanks for the detail.


QuoteOriginally posted by kenyee Quote
The Sigma images still look like they have a lot more "pop" (contrast/color). Any difference in focusing speed in that bright lighting?


I may revisit the JPEG settings on the D90, because in my testing/calibration at
home they looked a little bit more natural/muted - out in the technicolor real
world they maybe look a little too punchy. Still, not an unpleasing look for
a festive place like "Nickelodian Universe" in MOA!

QuoteQuote:
Glad mall security isn't hunting you down as a child perv w/ a camera


I have had mall security approach me when I inadvertently took shots of
a "security procedure" in progress - apparently they were testing a bomb
disposal procedure or something. Looked to me like a confused mall security
woman standing by a garbage can. But it was a "Security Procedure."

Plus I'm always shooting mostly this guy:



Although, sometimes....

03-05-2009, 01:25 PM   #27
Veteran Member
farfisa's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,274
QuoteOriginally posted by jsherman999 Quote
I have had mall security approach me when I inadvertently took shots of
a "security procedure" in progress - apparently they were testing a bomb
disposal procedure or something. Looked to me like a confused mall security
woman standing by a garbage can. But it was a "Security Procedure."
Good thing they didn't find the security woman's butt shots on your camera, then there'd be real trouble.
03-05-2009, 01:58 PM   #28
Inactive Account




Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canada eh!
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 673
QuoteOriginally posted by jsherman999 Quote
Although, sometimes....

Bwaahhaahahahahahahaha.......... I thought I was the only one.....

... actually it was of my wife when she wasn't paying attention. On a later date I was flipping through thumbnails on my computer and she gave me one of those, "Hey, why did you take a picture of a lady bending over?" when I told her it was HER, she just gave me the big rolling eyes and asked me to delete it, which I did.
03-05-2009, 03:46 PM   #29
Veteran Member
AlexanderMayorov's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Istanbul
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 466
Thanks for sharing.

Ive published this review on PentaxTurkey.com

03-07-2009, 10:18 AM   #30
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2007
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 8,237
Original Poster
Another two lenses at the MOA

.

Was shooting another couple lenses at the MOA yesterday for a bit...


Take a wild guess what this first lens is.

First, the resolution/FOV shot taken from the exact same location as with the
DA* and Sigma the other day:




Compared to other two crops (DA*, Sigma):



Now the snaps. Hint on this lens - It didn't cost me what the DA* and Sigma did













Crop of next shot:




Last edited by jsherman999; 03-07-2009 at 10:25 AM.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
135mm, 150mm, crop, da*, image, k-mount, meters, pentax lens, sharpness, sigma, slr lens, wide-open
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pentax 50-135 vs Sigma 50-150 vs other suggestions? boosted03gti Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 1 09-25-2010 01:31 PM
For Sale - Sold: FA 50mm, Tamron 90mm, Sigma 150-500mm, Kenko 1.5x & 2x teleconverters (CAN) Doczi Sold Items 5 08-06-2010 08:24 AM
Sigma 50-150 & DA 50-135 - Which is more reliable? yusuf Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 6 03-28-2010 03:35 PM
Sigma 50-150 and Pentax 50-135 skid2964 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 8 11-06-2009 08:26 AM
Pentax 50-135 vs Sigma 50-150 alehel Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 1 05-05-2009 07:40 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:50 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top