Aye. I loved hunting the classified, back in Brissie. Plenty of sad stories to go with the guys - mostly fairly old whose eyes are going, or, even sadder, have to pay for medical treatment - who sell 'em.
'Cept that Hess bloke ("Any relation to Rudolf?" "Actually, I'm trying to find that out.") He was fine. 'Cept for the bleedin' bush turkeys in his front yard. Just never used the ME much any more...nor the A f1.7 50mm that was screwed on the front. Both of which I snagged for $30.
Sorry, I'll stop
.
Yes, it's a huge piece of glass. It's a very..."square" looking lenses, which leads me to believe that
all of it was computer designed, not just the optical formula and path. No, it's not square, it just makes me think of squarishness.
The edges are all cut off at 90 degrees, as is the "adaptor" area at the base of the lens (you know, the only bit that was different between the K, F, FD, OM, MD, etc, etc versions of this lens) where the aperture ring is.
In essence, I can really imagine the outline of this finished lens done in late-seventies wireframe, on a green vector display attached to a computer the size of a Russian submarine.
I've got some shots from it in the lab, should be up on Saturday if I'm lucky.
But some quick notes:
It really, really is nicely made. Vivitar weren't intercoursing around when they made these babies. Weight like a hunk of lead-coated (for safety) uranium. Yes, it most certainly weighs down my ME Super something shocking, even with ME II winder on it, with 4 AAs in it.
Glossy black, which is nice, but to be picky, it's the kind of glossy that makes it look like cheap plastic.
Oh, and the "trumpet bell" - the flared bit at the front, with the filter ring -
overlaps the focusing ring - nicely preventing the entry of a lot of dust. Very nicely machined metal on this. It's got a late-seventies American look to it, but with Japanese precision.
Mine's in excellent nick, considering it's 31 years, 10 weeks old, and is a lens you really have to use, not just let it sit in your bag.
Having not looked at the shots yet, I'll can't give you an optical review. But I can say this. There is ZERO visible barrel distortion in viewfinder - very admirable, and I'm sorta hypersensitive to these things. It's not just an excellent zoom, I think - it's an excellent
prime.
Now, for a few negatives:
* The front-assembly wobble. Might be age-related.
* No DOF scale. Would've been hard to do, I 'spose, on a zoom likethis. And I could never get hyperfocal to work; but I like to think I could at 24mm.
* Focus and zoom rings are a bit stiff. Again, might be age-related.
Everything about this lens speaks precision. From the "weird" focal length (48mm - maybe it's where Pentax got the idea from...) to the odd aperture choice - 3.8, not 3.5 like Wikipedia says - says slight sacrifices were made for optical quality.
Niiiice, as they say.