Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
04-08-2009, 03:58 PM   #16
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 798
QuoteOriginally posted by Just1MoreDave Quote
It's one of the best 135mm lenses, particularily in screw-mount. There are two S-M-C versions. They have a part number stamped into the bottom (camera side) of the auto/manual switch. The better one is 43812, but 43802 isn't that far behind. The 43812 version was carried over into K-mount, and there's a thread down a bit from that lens.
Wow, great info. How does the Super Takumar version stack up to these two?

07-26-2010, 08:15 AM   #17
New Member




Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 11
Curious myself how the SUper-Takumar stacks up. The 43801 - is that the one you reference above Dave? When saying it is nearly identical in digital camera shots?
07-27-2010, 04:03 PM   #18
Veteran Member
macTak's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 759
QuoteOriginally posted by touchogrey Quote
Curious myself how the SUper-Takumar stacks up. The 43801 - is that the one you reference above Dave? When saying it is nearly identical in digital camera shots?
I have just recently gotten the 43802 (which was the first version of the Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 135mm f2.5) and have really been pleasantly surprised by it. It is excellent; plenty sharp even wide and has great bokeh. The 43801 is is optically the same, just without the SMC coatings. Just because the 43812 optical formula is arguably better does not mean that this one is not excellent!

I'm not sure how much of a difference the SMC coatings really make between the 43801 and 43802; I think there have been plenty of threads discussing this difference in more common lenses, and I imagine the same general conclusions would hold (the SMC probably will have a little better color and contrast and lack of flare, especially when shooting into the sun).
07-28-2010, 08:20 AM   #19
Moderator
Site Supporter
Blue's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida Hill Country
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 17,166
Old Thread Warning

There is a chance that the last batches of the 43801 had the SMC Coating that the 43802 had. When Pentax used up the previous version of coating the started using the new stuff.

BTW here is the 43802 & 43812 S-M-C 135/2.5 layout together.





Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
k-mount, multi, pentax lens, slr lens, takumar
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale - Sold: Super-Takumar 28mm f/3.5; Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 135mm f/2.5 (US) deadwolfbones Sold Items 1 07-11-2010 09:08 PM
SMC Takumar VS Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 50/1.4 RolloR Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 5 05-08-2010 06:38 AM
Wanted - Acquired: Pentax 105mm f:2.8 Super-Multi-Coated or Super Takumar raymeedc Sold Items 0 11-24-2009 10:05 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:40 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top