Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
03-29-2009, 04:33 PM   #1
Site Supporter
Biro's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,182
50mm Equivalent Lens for K200D

I'll soon be finally expanding my Pentax lens collection to include a fast prime in the traditional 50mm (equivalent) range. I've got the K200D right now (an upgrade is likely in the future) and my current lenses are the DA* 16-50 and 50-135mm f/2.8 zooms and the DA 50-300mm zoom.

I'd like to stick with better optics. I was considering the DA 35mm f/2.8 macro. It might still come to this because this is a very good macro lens. But I have f/2.8 zooms, so I was looking for a bit faster. And, although Pentax has the DA* 55mm f/1.4 lens... it seems plans for a 30mm version of this lens have fallen off the Pentax lens roadmap. Even if they still eventually bring it out, there's no telling how long we might have to wait.

The Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DC HSM lens might be an option - and it costs about the same as the Pentax 35mm f/2.8 macro (just over $400). Does anyone have any experience with the Sigma?

Suggestions are welcome. There are the FA Limited primes, of course. But I suspect I'd be paying for extra glass that I don't need with an APS-C sensor.

03-29-2009, 05:19 PM   #2
Junior Member




Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hilo, Hawaii
Posts: 42
From the story you told you are looking for approval to get the Sigma 30 f1.4. It is a decent lens. A little bit soft wide open but fairly boring in my opinion. For a standard lens focal length I bit the bullet and picked up the 31 mm f1.8 ltd. I will never regret it.
03-29-2009, 05:21 PM   #3
Veteran Member




Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 356
FA 35mm f/2.0 period.
03-29-2009, 08:56 PM   #4
RT1
Forum Member
RT1's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kansas City
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 85
Yeah...the Sigma 30 1.4 is really "soft" wide open. Here is an example of its "softness" on my K200D, shot wide open.



Seriously though. This lens is razor sharp...or perhaps i just got a really good copy.

Edit: Sigma does not offer HSM for the Pentax mount, is it is the standard screw driven focus. It still focuses very quickly, but it is not as quiet as those with HSM.


Last edited by RT1; 03-29-2009 at 09:12 PM.
03-30-2009, 06:28 AM   #5
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Outside of Philly
Posts: 1,564
I had the FA 35mm f/2 when I shot Pentax, and now I have the Sigma 30mm on my Canon setup....

Image quality was up there with both lenses, but I think the extra stop would sway me to the Sigma if I had to do it all over again. Focus is tricky at f/1.4, but the bokeh/rendering/etc....is amazing!

Here are some thoughts comparing the Sigma to the $$$$$$$$ Canon 35mm f/1.4 L

Sigma 30 f1.4 EX DC HSM v. Canon 35 f1.4 L USM - Test 1 Photo Gallery by lightrules at pbase.com

Bottom line, in Canon-land, it is THE "normal" lens to buy for crop bodies.
03-30-2009, 07:55 PM   #6
Site Supporter
Biro's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,182
Original Poster
My Sigma question was motivated by the fact that I haven't read much about it up until now. I'm sure that the focus is tricky at f/1.4 - I imagine the depth of field is an inch or less when wide open. Too bad that it doesn't offer HSM in the Pentax mount. But at least I know it's a decent lens should I decide I need to err on the side of (relative) frugality. And the other option in that price range (actually close to $100 less) is the FA 35mm f/2.0. And now I know that it's also a good lens. I appreciate the feedback.
03-30-2009, 08:06 PM   #7
Inactive Account




Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,972
FA35
DA35
Sigma 30
FA31 Ltd

Pick one - they are all stupendous lenses and all have just a little something different to offer from each other.

c[_]

P.S. I went with the FA35, as I already have a dedicated macro lens, couldn't find a Sigma readily available to try, and didn't want to spend $1000 CDN on a focal length that I don't use a tremendous amount. I'm more than pleased with my choice.
03-30-2009, 09:43 PM   #8
Veteran Member
Jasvox's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,110
I second, third and fourth the recommendation for the Pentax FA35/2. Brilliant lens and priced right too.

Jason

03-31-2009, 03:24 AM   #9
Veteran Member
roentarre's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 11,794
QuoteOriginally posted by RT1 Quote
Yeah...the Sigma 30 1.4 is really "soft" wide open. Here is an example of its "softness" on my K200D, shot wide open.

It is only microscopically soft for pixel peeping. Field work reveals little difference.
03-31-2009, 11:40 AM   #10
axl
Veteran Member




Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Nove Zamky, Slovakia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 7,181
I don't own FA35 but it if you have the money, FA31/1.8 is worth it...
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
30mm, 35mm, equivalent, f/1.4, f/2.8, k-mount, lens, macro, pentax, pentax lens, sigma, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DA 50 - 135 Equivalent? rollin Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 15 07-22-2009 07:05 PM
K200D + DA40 at the equivalent of ISO 6400 Marc Sabatella Pentax DSLR Discussion 12 01-24-2009 03:09 PM
Using a Pentax 50MM Type M Macro Lens question on a K200D hmnmn Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 4 04-19-2008 06:11 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:24 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top