Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
04-07-2009, 02:54 AM   #16
Forum Member




Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bangkok, Thaland
Posts: 80
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by shiestmiester Quote
I have a DAII 18-55 still under warranty i'm willing to let go of for $85. I have been happy with this lens but bought a Tamron 17-50 f/2.8. If you need the speed I highly recommend this lens. If you need a nice cheap walkaround, the kit is a good option. I have no experience with 16-45 so no comment.

Depends on your application.

~T
Are you still willing to sell your kit lens shiestmiester?

04-08-2009, 01:08 PM   #17
Site Supporter




Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Mateo, CA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 122
Maybe I got a bad copy of the 18-55 II, but after a week of using it with the K20D (I bought the kit) I ordered the 16-45, which I'm very happy with. The 18-55 II is fine for casual shooting, but can't capture full detail and color in a busy landscape at 55mm, especially at the borders, on the K20D's 14mp sensor. As someone else said, you can notice a difference as soon as you look through the viewfinder, which is much brighter with 16-45. The colors, contrast and sharpness are all noticeably better with the 16-45; the improvement is worth the money to me.
04-08-2009, 03:12 PM   #18
Forum Member
shutterbob's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 69
Go With the DA 16-45

I side with all of those who favor the DA 16-45. Overall this lens is a terrific performer and photos are consistently sharper than the 18-55. After getting the 16-45 3 years ago, I have NEVER put the 18-55 back on the camera. With the kit lens, I was always "almost satisfied" with my photos; almost just doesn't cut it anymore. The 16-45 is remarkably close to a prime in contrast, sharpness, and clarity. It is without a doubt worth the difference.
04-10-2009, 01:10 AM   #19
Forum Member




Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bangkok, Thaland
Posts: 80
Original Poster
Thanks guys for all your inputs. I appreciate all your suggestions. I decided to go for the 16-45. in fact I just paid a 16-46-5 in one of our forum members. Just waiting for it to be shipped.

04-10-2009, 01:51 AM   #20
Senior Member




Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 131
Ive had all 3 lenses in this range, the 18-55 16-45 and the 16-50. the 16-45 is by far the best bang for the buck. the 16-50 is better but much more expensive and they are both much better than the kit lens in my opinion
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
16-45mm, 18-55mm, budget, k-mount, lens, pentax lens, reviews, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is the extra $ on the FA77mm worth it over the DA70mm? rustynail925 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 71 05-13-2010 08:40 AM
is the k-7 worth and extra $700 pfcapture Pentax DSLR Discussion 6 12-30-2009 09:04 PM
would u pay an extra $7,250 for this? d3x vs k20d vitalsax Pentax DSLR Discussion 33 12-22-2008 09:09 PM
is it worth to pay US$ 200 for 50mm f 1.2 fearview Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 26 06-08-2008 06:45 PM
K10 worth the extra $300? Jobs Pentax DSLR Discussion 20 09-25-2006 07:38 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:17 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top