Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
04-01-2009, 06:35 PM   #1
Forum Member




Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bangkok, Thaland
Posts: 80
Is It Worth to pay extra $125?

I have tight budget this time. I'm planning to buy another lens. What I have now is the one and only FA 50mm F1.4. I love this lens. However, i need a wide budget lens. I have two lenses in my mind. First is the 16-45mm and the 18-55mm AL 11. I've read good reviews about the 16-45 in the pentax lens database. I also read some good reviews of the new kit lens 18-55mm AL11. The price difference of the 16-45 is about 100-125 dollars. Is it worth to pay an extra $125 for the 16-45mm? Second, is the IQ of the 18-55mm AL 11 far behind the 16-45?

04-01-2009, 07:00 PM   #2
Senior Member




Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Michigan/USA
Posts: 173
If you can spend the extra $125, I would say it is worth it because even if IQ is identical, the 16-45 is faster (4 vs. 4.5) and wider (16 vs. 18).
04-01-2009, 07:19 PM   #3
Forum Member




Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bangkok, Thaland
Posts: 80
Original Poster
Is the FOV difference between 16 and 18 really that big?

Last edited by jadem; 04-01-2009 at 07:20 PM. Reason: word repitition
04-01-2009, 07:22 PM   #4
Senior Member




Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vaughan, Ontario
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 269
i'd say it's noticeable.

04-01-2009, 07:59 PM   #5
Veteran Member
alexeyga's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 838
It's worth it!!! The IQ if 16-45 is better and the kit lens has vignetting issues at it's wide end.
04-01-2009, 08:00 PM   #6
Veteran Member




Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Perth Australia
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,512
Yeah at the low end every 1 mm makes a fair difference ... vs at the high end there is very little between 250 - 300mm

If you have the FA 50 1.4 your not going to be happy with any of these zoom's quality imo.

Maybe the Sigma 20mm f1.8 prime
or the DA 14mm 2.8

Probably both out of your budget.
04-01-2009, 08:05 PM   #7
Forum Member
shiestmiester's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 97
I have a DAII 18-55 still under warranty i'm willing to let go of for $85. I have been happy with this lens but bought a Tamron 17-50 f/2.8. If you need the speed I highly recommend this lens. If you need a nice cheap walkaround, the kit is a good option. I have no experience with 16-45 so no comment.

Depends on your application.

~T

Last edited by shiestmiester; 04-01-2009 at 08:06 PM. Reason: added info
04-01-2009, 09:23 PM   #8
Veteran Member
soccerjoe5's Avatar

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philippines
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,354
I'd stick to a kit lens or go high end. You'd be surprised at how good photos can be with using "just" a kit lens.

04-01-2009, 09:42 PM   #9
Forum Member




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Queen creek, az
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 79
For just over 200 used I'd go for a 16-45, compared to the 18-55I the center resolution is a bit better but it is vastly more consistent than the kit lens throughout the rest of the frame. It is also very usable wide open.
04-02-2009, 12:42 AM   #10
axl
Inactive Account




Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Nove Zamky, Slovakia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 7,181
One of the reasons why I never bought 16-45 is that 18-55 is great lens for the category it is! Sure, everybody who compared those two prefers 16-45 but I'm not too sure if it's worth spending money from "tight budget" Personaly I've never found enough difference to justify purchase of 16-45.... pick 18-55 and enjoy it, later when you'll save more get something far better.

on the other side, I did like the prime suggestion mentioned above, how about DA21ltd?

BR
04-02-2009, 07:46 AM   #11
New Member




Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Morris County, NJ
Posts: 23
"Personally I've never found enough difference to justify purchase of 16-45.... pick 18-55 and enjoy it, later when you'll save more get something far better."

I find this informative, I was thinking about upgrading to the 16-45 and even though the 16-45 is somewhat nicer than the 18-55 II, I'll wait until I can justify something better.
04-02-2009, 08:00 AM   #12
Veteran Member




Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: La Crescenta, CA
Posts: 7,452
I'm kind of in the same spot. I know the 16-45mm is a better lens, but I'm not sure that it's better enough to make it worth upgrading. Better to wait for a good copy of the 16-50 to come along, I think.

And I find myself not using the kit much, anyway (not due to any optical defect).
04-02-2009, 08:18 AM   #13
Senior Member




Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Grand Rapids, MI. USA. Earth.
Posts: 139
I was in the same position and went for the DA 21 ltd. Take a look, at least.
04-03-2009, 07:42 AM   #14
Veteran Member




Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tirana, Albania, South Europe, Planet Earth
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 621
For the extra money the da 16-45 costs I'd rather buy a used 360 flash as well as a used kith lens.
04-03-2009, 10:36 AM   #15
Senior Member
K100Dave's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 111
One of the found benefits that I have come across between the two, is how much sharper the 16-45 is at closer distances than that of the original kit lens. Btw, the 16-45 focuses really close to your subject - like 4-5 inches away. There was a post somewhere on here that stated the 16-45 as a macro. Don't know when I read this but there were pretty good points to consider in that post.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
16-45mm, 18-55mm, budget, k-mount, lens, pentax lens, reviews, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is the extra $ on the FA77mm worth it over the DA70mm? rustynail925 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 71 05-13-2010 08:40 AM
is the k-7 worth and extra $700 pfcapture Pentax DSLR Discussion 6 12-30-2009 09:04 PM
would u pay an extra $7,250 for this? d3x vs k20d vitalsax Pentax DSLR Discussion 33 12-22-2008 09:09 PM
is it worth to pay US$ 200 for 50mm f 1.2 fearview Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 26 06-08-2008 06:45 PM
K10 worth the extra $300? Jobs Pentax DSLR Discussion 20 09-25-2006 07:38 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:47 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top