Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
04-13-2009, 01:42 PM   #1

DA 16-45 f/4 -vs- DA* 16-50 f/2.8

Who here has had both of these lens and prefers the 16-45 over the 16-50?

Is the SDM and 1/2 stop worth the money for the DA*?

Is this has been asked before, please forgive me but indulge me anyway.

04-13-2009, 01:53 PM   #2
Senior Member

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: madison
Posts: 239
F2.8 is a full stop faster than F4
04-13-2009, 01:54 PM   #3
Veteran Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 944
its all about where and what you are goint to shoot.

2.8 + weather resistant will allow you to use this lens almost everywhere indoor or outdoor, rain or sun, and so on

also 2.8 will give you better DOF for portraits.

16-45 is super sharp and a great lens for out door and its also cheaper and lighter
04-13-2009, 02:03 PM   #4
Veteran Member
Ben_Edict's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SouthWest "Regio"
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,303
QuoteOriginally posted by racinsince55 Quote
Who here has had both of these lens and prefers the 16-45 over the 16-50?

Is the SDM and 1/2 stop worth the money for the DA*?
Yes. Especially as it is 1 full f-stop faster.


04-13-2009, 02:22 PM   #5

QuoteOriginally posted by cousinsane Quote
F2.8 is a full stop faster than F4
I stand corrected. Old minds sometimes get things wrong.
04-13-2009, 05:37 PM   #6
Veteran Member

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Auckland
Posts: 553
The silent focus is nice, but it's not much faster. Given the faster lens, autofocus should be slightly better in dimming light too.

The 16-50 is: 65% heavier than the 16-45 (600g vs 365g)
The 16-50 has: 9 aperture blades rather than 8
The 16-50 has: a really nice focusing ring (compared to a normal DA lens)

One aspect of the 16-50 which might be a disadvantage for you - it casts a shadow with the built in flash.

I'm really quite thrilled with the 16-50 and am glad that I bought it - I didn't actually buy it for f2.8, but instead for the weather sealing, and proper focusing ring. Having said that, I have some shots of family moments taken indoors I never would have been able to pull off with an f4 lens (without a flash), so I'm really glad that it goes to f2.8, even if I don't use it as such most of the time.
04-13-2009, 05:50 PM   #7
Community Manager
Loyal Site Supporter
Ash's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toowoomba, Queensland
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 22,695
Yes, I started a little fire when I compared these two lenses (only in MTF data)...
DA* 16-50 vs DA 16-45 in IQ

My conclusion is a lens is a whole lot more than just MTF data - and the comparison of these two lenses exemplifies that. I much prefer the 16-50 despite what all the numbers say...
04-13-2009, 05:56 PM   #8
Veteran Member
jamonation's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toronto
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 364
OrenMC just started a similar thread, there are some pictures to look at too I posted there stating how unequivocally happy I am with the lens.


  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
da 16-45 f/4, da*, k-mount, pentax lens, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:27 AM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]