Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
06-09-2009, 08:52 PM   #16
Senior Member




Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Quebec
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 210
I faced the same dilema months ago and decided to go with the DA*50-135 because I wanted a lens for indoor events (gymnasium, swimming pool, arenas) and of course portrait. I am so glad I bought this lens. It's the perfect lens for my use.

Now consider this. Before APS-C, people used to buy 70-200 for portrait and indoor events. With the arrival of digital cameras with APS-C captors and 1,5 crop factor, people should now be looking for 50-135 range since it is the equivalent to 70-200 on a FF camera. I am always surprise when I hear people saying we should keep buying 70-200 when in fact it becomes the equivalent of a 100-300 on APS-C.

Now, if you want to shoot outdoor sport events, consider the DA*200. Again, for years people have been using 300mm f/2.8 for these kind of events, which is the same as the DA*200 with the crop factor. Considering the quality of this prime lens, you can even use it with a 1.7X adapter and it becomes a 340mm f/4.5, the equivalent of a 510mm f/4.5 on FF. Tis combinaison is not ideal but good enough if you want to do a little bit of wildlife.

Best regards.


Last edited by SylBer; 06-10-2009 at 12:07 PM.
06-09-2009, 08:58 PM   #17
Veteran Member
GLXLR's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 686
Original Poster
Well, he uses a Canon and I think Marc is right. Thanks for the replies and sorry for my spasms. I just want to MAKE SURE that i get the lens I would use the most and now I am all aboard for the 50-135mm. If it isn't enough range, i will either get the DA* 200mm or a Sigma 100-300mm. Thanks for all your input! (I still need a flash and a 16-50mm now lol)
06-10-2009, 03:30 AM   #18
Veteran Member
creampuff's Avatar

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Singapore
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,955
Having recently tried the DA* 60-250mm f/4, I have to say I definitely feel it is superior to the DA* 50-135mm and definitely more versatile in terms of zoom range. Pretty light weight too.
So I'd suggest you don't rule out this very sharp lens.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
50-135mm, 70-200mm, k-mount, pentax lens, shots, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
50-135mm vs 70-200mm houstonmacgregor Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 19 07-16-2010 01:55 PM
For Sale - Sold: Super Takumar 135mm & 200mm, Vivitar 135mm, SMC 28mm MSM Sold Items 24 06-13-2010 09:55 PM
Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 vs. Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 vs Pentax 50-135mm f/2.8 nah Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 27 12-08-2008 01:03 AM
DA* 50-135mm or DA* 200mm EAD Studios Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 17 08-30-2008 05:27 AM
For Sale - Sold: Make Offers: Haminex 135mm f/2.8, Sears 135mm f/2.8, Super Albinar 100-200mm f inneyeseakay Sold Items 1 06-23-2007 02:05 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:54 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top