Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
06-01-2009, 09:27 AM   #1
Inactive Account

Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 162
Cheap "normal" lens for Pentax APS

Hello all,

I was wonderig if there would be interes on such a lens. I like the idea of Nikon to manufacture the new AF-S G lens for DX format, the Nikkor 35mm f:1.8 ( ), a cheap but very good lens for beginners and people with less money to spend, a lens more or less, equivalent to the "normal" lens that once equipped the 35mm camera kits (50mm f:2.0/1.7) and almost in the same price range (and maybe quality) as Canon/Nikon 50mm f:1.8 lenses (130-200 max, USD).

Particularly for me, the "Limited" lenses are too expensive and lately the price of FA 35mm f:2.0 increased and as an irony one of the reasons for which I choosed Pentax two years ago (over Nikon) was cheap system/lenses (Pentax K100D + 18-55 + a second hand 80-320 FA) +a good ration of features/quality vs. prices (in those times 50mm f:1.4 and the already mentionesd 35mm FA were much more cheaper).

I tried using 28mm/35mm manual focusing lenses (I stiil use them on FF film cameras with big and bright viewfinders) but it's not the same because for the kind of photography I do , a lens with AF , small and relatively fast (~2.0) prime would be the "last piece in the puzzle"

06-01-2009, 09:41 AM   #2
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 27,663
A few months ago I would have pointed you to the FA 35/2. It is a great lens both in terms of value and of performance. Now that it is officially out of production, both price and availability are a problem. Beyond that, the choices are pretty lean if you need AF and low price. Good luck.

06-01-2009, 10:45 AM   #3
Just1MoreDave's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Aurora, CO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 4,873
Pentax had a 30mm lens on their roadmap last year, I believe before the DA 35mm macro, then it vanished. Making a 30mm lens that competes with the FA31 for quality at any price would be illogical. Knowing that they were going to discontinue the FA35, had already discontinued the FA28, and otherwise had a great lineup of APS-C primes, they should recognize the need for a 30mm f2.0 lens. They might consider f2.4 to hit a size/cost target but anyone can get f2.8 in a zoom. Nikon's lens at least proved that someone thought of the same idea.

Although it makes sense to me, who knows if it's their plan or how long you might wait for such a lens. There are some Sigma options for around $400 or a used Pentax to tide you over.
06-01-2009, 10:49 AM   #4
Senior Member
eyou's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 224
i believe that MIA lens was a 30mm DA*, so still not a cheap solution to a normal lens.

06-01-2009, 10:53 AM   #5
Veteran Member

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 484
I agree, an APS-C version of the FA 50mm f/1.4 would be great.
Now that Pentax has announced two weather-sealed DA lenses, we may even hope for a DA 35mm f/1.8 WR!
06-01-2009, 11:17 AM   #6
Veteran Member
kristoffon's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Brazil
Posts: 532
I'd go with the Sigma 30 f/1.4 if on a budget, or try to score a FA 28, 30 or 35.
06-01-2009, 09:08 PM   #7
Just1MoreDave's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Aurora, CO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 4,873
QuoteOriginally posted by eyou Quote
i believe that MIA lens was a 30mm DA*, so still not a cheap solution to a normal lens.
Yes, but it vanished, therefore everything about it is up for change. It now can be any lens we can imagine.

Sigma has a 28mm f1.8 (FF, $380) and a 30mm f1.4 (APS-C, $440). Pentax has the FA31 f1.8 for $900 and used to have the FA35 f2 for $300. Is the Nikon sold out? It used to be $200.

A cheap normal has to be less than $300 or it isn't cheap, 28-35mm or it isn't normal. Weather sealing is a great idea and should not be terribly expensive on a prime lens. I would like to see them use the Pentax-M 50mm f1.7 as a model: not the fastest possible, but reaching maximum sharpness early, say f4.

They wouldn't need a huge maximum aperture if that was possible, but I think it would be hard to sell f2.8. I wouldn't expect an aperture ring, FF capability, more than 6 aperture blades or a metal body. I don't know whether that lens could be built for $250 on introduction, $200 later on, but it sounds great on paper.

  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
35mm, 50mm, fa, k-mount, lens, lens for pentax, lenses, nikon, pentax, pentax lens, price, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The "Cheap AF 28ish-80ish zoom lens" club Steve Beswick Lens Clubs 141 06-27-2017 01:02 PM
Tamron DI vs Pentax SMC vs "normal" coatings ?? Carniflex Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 1 08-26-2010 03:55 AM
Is there a cheap "landscape" lens that is better than the 18-55 kit I got with K100D? shaolin95 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 17 06-13-2009 06:37 AM
Definition of "Normal" according to Pentax Manual jsherman999 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 37 12-12-2008 11:46 AM
And the best "normal" Pentax lens is... FHPhotographer Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 6 08-04-2008 04:17 PM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:44 PM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]