Originally posted by kuuan But now checking I see that there also is the FA 35mm f2, and I do like low light photography and fast lenses. And the FA 35mm f2 is..cheaper? Excuse my innocence, but is the DA 35 so much better? Or is it above all it's smaller size and macro capability which make it dear?
If you try out and it autofocuses at close range and infinity, manual focuses fine, no significant marks on glass when held up to light, no BF, FF, aperture reading shows, apreture blades closing properly (check on different values), and no marks on the body, I think you should be good to go.... (anything I forgot to mention?)
Case for FA 35:
Full frame (FA 35 + MZ-7 + Panorama Mode = Love)
f/2 (resolution and contrast at f2 is great, the only problem with f2 is PF)
Faster focusing (DA 35 is slooow)
Smoother Bokeh
FA colors (more neutral?)
Hood with polarizer hole
Case for DA 35:
True Macro
Virtually No PF
Better flare control
Interesting Bokeh
Quick Shift (important for macro)
Metal Build
DA colors (red and blue saturation)
I have the FA and I love it
If you don't shoot film I'd say just go with whatever you find a good deal on first since they're both good lenses.