Originally posted by mtngal Reviews are great as far as they go. But there's nothing quite like actually handling a lens before you make a decision (or handling one that is of a similar weight and size). Most of the time I have trouble judging ergonomics from a review. For instance, many people consider the DA*16-50 a heavy lens. Compared to either the DA*200 or DA*300, it's pretty light.
True, but comparing a standard zoom to a long telephoto lens, it *should* be light. It's heavy compared to other standard zooms.
Quote: I just wish there were more places to actually handle the Pentax equipment, like if they were to have reps periodically travel around like they've done with the K-7 tour (which got me to spend far more money on lenses than I should have).
That road tour was fun indeed. The K-7 demo I could have taken or left, but the opportunity to play with all the current lenses - that was worthwhile in itself!
Actually, I was struck by a similar thought as you - the 16-50, while larger and heavier than slower lenses of similar range, and also probably most f/2.8 standard zooms as well, felt quite a bit better to me than the 50-135.