Originally posted by Digitalis I agree up to a point. There are subtle differences between lenses you can't say the DA21 limited is capable of the same degree of resolution the FA 31 is capable of. You can't say the FA 50mm f/1.4 is as sharp as the DA55 f/1.4 don't get me wrong; both lenses are excellent, but one clearly has an edge over the other. At the end of the day the differences between a good lens and a great lens may be small but it's there.
back on topic, if you're talking about perceived sharpness (lack of ca, microcontrast, etc.) then sure maybe the A50 is great, but is it really better than the FA50 at f4 to f8?
Originally posted by Digitalis I use a Hexanon 50mm f/1.2 on my Leica m3 - bite me.
you didn't at all comment on my statement about the versatility
... i'm not here to argue about RF lenses.
Last edited by k100d; 08-29-2009 at 08:00 PM.