Originally posted by jolinjo A low-light lens was mainly meant for concert shooting and darker indoor conditions.
I like the DA40 a lot for basic indoor snapshots of people (candids), as the focal length is great for this, the focus speed is as good as it gets, it's unbelievably unobtrusive, and f/2.8 is just "fast" enough to be useful in low light if you don't mind ISO (in my mind, a little noise never hurt anyone, but the shallower DOF from larger apertures such as f/2 or f/1.4 is very problematic in these situations).
But I don't find the DA40 very useful at all for concert photography. Not nearly long enough for closeups of individuals (which is what I mainly do), but not nearly wide enough to capture a whole band, either, unless you are far enough away that's you're likely to get a good chunk of audience in the shot too. Which isn't to say it's isn't occasionally useful to get certain types of groupings of people, or full body shots of individuals from the right distance. But definitely not my first choice. That would be the M100/2.8 if you're looking for just one inexpensive ($100 or less) lens.
Quote: A wide-angle would be great cause in many situations Ive wished I had one.
So you mean, something wider than the 18-55 you already have (which is already quite wide - as wide as many photographers ever use)? Or something of better quality or smaller or faster at about the same width (eg, like the DA21)?
Quote: The DA 10-17 sounds very interesting ! How can it be both a fish-eye and a Wide angle?
All fisheyes are wide angles. Perhaps you mean something different by wide angle?