 |
 | Search this Thread |
| 09-21-2009, 12:24 PM | #1 |
| 50/f1.4 SMC-M vs SMC-K & 35/f2 SMC Takumar vs. SMC-M
Hi! It's my first post. I already have a 50/f1.4 SMC-K lens, and I'm wondering, does anyone have both the SMC-K and SMC-M versions? I'm wondering if there is any difference, and if so, which one is better. Also, I want to buy a 35MM f/2, but I see there are many different versions. In particular, the M42 SMC Takumar seems to have a much larger front element in the photos I've seen than the Pentax-M, but the Pentax-M is newer... Does anyone know which of these lenses is the better one? Thanks! -cwm 50/f1.4 SMC-K + Canon 10D: unmounted/handheld w/lens tilt  | |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it! |
| k-mount, pentax lens, slr lens, smc, smc-k, smc-m, takumar, vs |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| For Sale - Sold: SMC 85mm f/2.2 Soft, SMC-M 50mm f/4 Macro, SMC-M 135 3.5, SMC-M 85mm 2, SMC-M | jgmankos | Sold Items | 3 | 06-14-2010 06:48 PM |
| For Sale - Sold: Pentax SMC-A 70-210mm/4 Macro, SMC-A 50mm/2, Takumar Bayonet 135mm/2.5 | wallyb | Sold Items | 10 | 03-12-2009 12:46 PM |
| SMC Pentax-A 50/1.2 vs. SMC Takumar 50/1.4 (Normal Lens Shootout Final) | carpents | Pentax SLR Lens Discussion | 6 | 09-22-2007 05:13 AM |
