Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
09-30-2009, 12:55 AM   #16
Veteran Member

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: National Capital Region
Posts: 738
I just purchased from someone a month-old copy which was a replacement by Pentax for a dud. I haven't run a whole lot of tests but so far the images have been great!

09-30-2009, 01:12 AM   #17
Veteran Member

Join Date: Mar 2007
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,471
Im actually more happy and impressed with the 16-50 than the 50-135 so I am quite surprised by that. my copy is great
09-30-2009, 08:25 AM   #18
New Member

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 23
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by Ash Quote
The serial numbers can tell you approximately at what stage the lenses were manufactured - the serial number database goes into this more. Then again I doubt that Adorama would have sent you 3 first generation 16-50s and even then odds were against you having decentering on all 3! You were just unfortunate.

You could, of course, try another vendor like B&H, who have a similar returns policy but may have a newer (and non-decentered!) copy to ship you...
Ash, I went through the entire database. Read every posting. However I cant really see how one can determine the manufacturing date by looking at the serial number???
09-30-2009, 08:38 AM   #19
Community Manager
Loyal Site Supporter
Ash's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toowoomba, Queensland
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 22,695
There's no way to determine accurately when each lens was manufactured.
What's more important is if the lens bought new now came from the initial batch (higher decentering rate) or the second wave of production (fewer overall issues). Serial numbers starting with 901 were more likely to be from the initial batch, but as seen in the database, there are a number of reports of failures regardless of the serial number - again I consider this responder bias, and can't be in any way an authoritative measure of failure rates.

In any case, there seems to be more user confidence in the second batch, which in many threads has been discussed as more reliable in IQ - SDM failures are, of course, another story...


  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
16-50mm, da*, da* 16-50mm, issues, k-mount, pentax lens, slr lens, statement
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
the myth of the self-made millionaire Nesster General Talk 24 09-28-2010 11:51 AM
Is sensor reflection a myth? Lowell Goudge Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 10 06-06-2010 06:13 AM
50mm lens comparison myth? raymeedc Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 11 06-01-2009 11:40 AM
What's your favorite tripod myth? philbaum Pentax Camera and Field Accessories 11 02-04-2009 03:03 AM
pentax lens Myth ljfitz Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 10 12-29-2008 03:47 PM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:05 AM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]