Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
11-03-2009, 09:21 AM   #91
Senior Member
jslifoaw's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Toronto/Victoria
Posts: 262
Although more value-oriented primes would certainly be welcome, should buyers be basing their system choices on lenses that do not exist? If I was looking for a DSLR that could use AF primes that didn't cost $500-1000, I never would have had Pentax on the radar. In fact Pentax is small enough that I wouldn't even have hoped for them to start making those kinds of lenses anytime soon, and I would have directed my attention towards Canon (and maybe Nikon, although their entry bodies won't AF many of those lenses).

Anybody who has recently bought into Pentax hoping for future cheap AF primes was probably taking a gamble; I don't think it's reasonable to buy into a system missing desired lenses and assume that they'd appear once you bought the body. Aside from maybe the FA35 and FA50, the only way to score cheaper primes was and is still through the used market (for the last few years anyway).

Pentax does have some appealing features like SR, WR, and appealing ergonomics/size, but those won't really help someone looking for primes under $250, and it is up to buyers to choose another system or bite the bullet and either use cheap zooms or go for the upper-end primes. I don't think Pentax tried to screw anybody over since it has been like this for awhile.

It's sort of like choosing to buy an electric car and then becoming frustrated over why you can't use it most places because there are no charging stations and expecting that there ought to be more of them so that everyone can start using electric cars (who has one to begin with since it would be more unreaslistic to build all the stations first and hope to sell a ton of electric cars), when you could have just as easily chosen a standard or hybrid vehicle that doesn't have the same limitations.

11-03-2009, 01:04 PM   #92
New Member




Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Belleville, Ontario
Posts: 16
I bought into Pentax for a Light&Small prime setup for backpacking and travel. I bought three DA ltd. lenses and a K-7 before a week long backpacking trip this august. I have now filled out my lens lignup with three old M lenses for when I'm willing to carry more weight.
Now my next lens purchase will be an f1.4 lens intended for low light and shallow DoF. It will rarely ever be used faster than 2.8. My DA40mm and DA70 are just fine at f2.8, and weight 1/2-1/3 as much anyway. I'm not going to buy an f1.4 to use at f5.6; that would just be silly.

The lens I want is one that hasn't been brought up here... the Voigtlander 58mm f1.4
This is a perfect portrait length(87mm eqv.) with decent bokeh and high quality build. It is also cheaper, lighter, and smaller than the DA*55.

The DA*55 puzzels me a bit, if I wanted a lens to be weather sealed for outside, then I would want light weight and quality construction more than wide aperture. If you sealed a Da 40 ltd, then it would be the perfect outdoor/hikeing lens. But I wouldn't take a heavy f1.4 55mm hikeing, and if I'm not hikeing then I can take it inside if it starts to rain!!

If they weren't going to give it that Ltd. touch, then what exactly was wrong with the FA50 f1.4. Why would a company focused on small and light replace a nice compact lens with a huge monster who's only advantage is weather sealing, which in my opinion is of little use in a heavy/bulky(lens+hood) lens.

Ok... done my rant for the day.
11-03-2009, 02:40 PM   #93
Pentaxian
Marc Sabatella's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 10,686
QuoteOriginally posted by jslifoaw Quote
Pentax does have some appealing features like SR, WR, and appealing ergonomics/size, but those won't really help someone looking for primes under $250
Good post, but just to nitpick a little - actually, those *do* help someone looking for primes under $250. There *are* quite a few primes available for under $250; and while they don't have AF, the presence of SR means they *are* stabilized. And given the choice between dozens of excellent $250-or-less primes that are stabilized but lack AF, or basically just two or three so-so $250-or-less primes that are not stabilized (and no stabilized primes *at all* under $1000 or under 100mm), I have a hard time seeing that as clear win for the latter system.
11-03-2009, 03:00 PM   #94
Senior Member
jslifoaw's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Toronto/Victoria
Posts: 262
QuoteOriginally posted by Marc Sabatella Quote
Good post, but just to nitpick a little - actually, those *do* help someone looking for primes under $250.
Whoops, I meant to add "AF" before "primes under $250"

non-SR AF vs SR MF is a tough call. I can call myself lucky and say I have DA and FA primes with SR, but for a lot of people manual focus is a pain. Sometimes I tell fellow Pentax shooters that there are some nice lenses available for sale somewhere (good Pentax-A ones) and then once I mention manual focus they lose interest completely.

The value of SR is probably why a lot of folks will choose Pentax and then decide to complain about the lack of AF primes later instead of choosing another system with plenty of those lenses and complaining about the lack of in-body stabilization

11-04-2009, 08:09 PM   #95
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern Indiana
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 14,963
It is a tough situation for Pentax. I think that most people's first lens is the kit lens. Then, if they decide they need another lens, they get a telephoto. Finally, they move to the superzoom stage, where all in one seems the perfect option. Most photographers never get to this stage, but those who do, usually stop here.

There are a few brave, intrepid souls who venture on out from there into the domain of primes. There may be a few more of them for Pentax (percentage wise) than for the other brands, but there aren't very many of them. The thing is that they are very rabid and they crowd fora just like this one and the only thing they like better than a sharp prime is a cheap, sharp prime.

So there you go: the few, the proud, the primes.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
focus, k-mount, lens, lenses, market, pentax, pentax lens, range, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale - Sold: Two fast AF lenses - Sigma 30mm/1.4 and DA*55mm/1.4 (AUS) DanielT74 Sold Items 8 09-29-2010 10:23 PM
I want some light, sharp, fast prime lenses...hopefully I came to the right place innocent smith Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 15 04-21-2010 02:51 AM
Why no fast 50mm macro lenses? SOldBear Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 6 03-02-2009 09:46 PM
Fast Lenses Pure Captures Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 36 08-28-2008 04:18 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:10 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top