Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
10-16-2009, 11:55 PM   #16
New Member




Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3
The 50-135mm is very nice for portraits. Fast enough for sports photography, depending on how close you are. Really nice bokeh. Favorite lens right, but it's heavy!

10-17-2009, 02:33 AM   #17
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jun 2009
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,679
QuoteOriginally posted by sebberry Quote
I guess I am not going to get what I want in a DA* lens

I guess the next best thing would be to sell my 18-50 and 50-200 and get a DA 18-250...

I wanted weathersealing tho

That being said.. when would someone use the 50-135? Doesn't seem very flexible.
For fun, I often will take only one lens with me on a walk/hike...it makes me look at things differently. No reason the 50-135 cannot be a solid choice. It's a matter of knowing your lens and how else will you get to know it unless you take it out and use it creatively.

Also if you want a wider coverage and WR there is always the 60-250...a fair bit more cash, but also a nice range for a nature walk/hike...

Me, when I had all my Canon gear I carried a 10-20, a 24-60, 55-250, as well as a 150-500 plus a 180mm Macro. I would pack them all if I did not know the area well or just felt like taking everything as well as the kitchen sink.

Right now I truly miss the 10-20 when I am out. I enjoy the 35, 43 & 77ltd's and only have a 24-60 zoom. Still I can find interesting things to shoot...even birds if I am patient enough.

I started with just a 40D and a kit 28-135 along with the 10-20mm...and guess what? They worked FINE and I had fun. Later I found I used the 55-250 more than others on hikes or even the zoo. So, I think if I were to choose a single Pentax lens it would be either the the 50-135 or the 60-250. Later consider adding a wide zoom when you can...and/or get a couple nice primes and use the old foot zoom. I will say I am in deep lust with the Pentax primes I have...but OTH I really miss the convenience of the zooms, which today are pretty dang sharp.

Oh, if you can live w/o WR then the 55-300 is a super looking lens from the sample shots I've seen around the web.

Last if you do decide on a heavier lens, invest in a good comfy neck strap...ONCE and only ONCE I lugged around my Bigmos (the Sigma 150-500) mounted to my 40D for 6hrs and lemme tell ya, that 4.2 lb. lens induced a fair amount of chafing...I was fine with the weight but I used a monopod off and on...the DA 60-250 is just under 2.75lbs so it's really not oppressively heavy if you are in fair condition.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
bit, da*, k-mount, lens, nature, pentax lens, slr lens
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nature A couple of images from today's nature walk. pcarfan Post Your Photos! 10 10-05-2009 04:11 AM
Nature walk sabarrett Post Your Photos! 3 12-09-2008 10:41 PM
5 mostly artistic nature shots from a walk little laker Post Your Photos! 3 05-15-2008 07:39 AM
Water's Edge Nature Walk spyglass Post Your Photos! 4 03-12-2008 01:04 PM
Late Winter Nature Walk (6 images) Nightwatch Post Your Photos! 6 02-28-2007 09:42 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:15 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top