Originally posted by axl you could try 40. It's a great lens. Focuses fast and has great IQ. I own 50/1.7 and the difference between it and DA40 is noticable. If you want I can post pics from the same spot so you cann visualise the difference in FOV. Question though: are you sure 2.8 is fast enough for you? I mean, DA40 can easily handle stationary/near stationary subjects in semi-decent light but there are times where 2.8 just won't cut it. It was my 1st prime and I love it but if I had the choice again I'd go for FA35.
BR
Peter
If I push ISO 1600, it works. With normal size 4x6 prints, I'm satisfied with the results from my K100D. However, this is a significant limitation. I'd love to get the 35/2 somewhere. I have found one for just over $300 in as new condition. This is so frustrating that there are so few "afordable" (everyone's definition of that is different) AF options available. It really makes me want to get a D90 just to use the AF-S 35/1.8, AF-D 24/2.8, and AF 50/1.4D. All 3 of those great lenses under $400. Grr...
I think I may have to really consider what my needs are, and what system would best suit them now, before I invest anything further into a specific brand. Granted, I'll never part with what I have, my K100D and Pentax MF primes are jewels.