For some reason, I am always reluctant to post shots I don't like - I guess mostly because I know how often I am the one trying to convince someone else their poor shots are *not* the fault of their gear :-). And I admit this is *not* a controlled test. But FWIW, here's typical sample. Hopefully you've seen enough of my concert shots to know that I *am* capable to getting much better results in pretty much identical conditions (I shoot in this same jazz club all the time) and with pretty much the exact same ISO, shutter speed, etc. My empirical experience is that I am easily able to get better results with every lens I've ever tried - even my 500/8 mirror(!) - than I was able to muster when trying out the A50/1.7 + Kenko 1.5 TC. This was one of the only shots I kept from a night where I forced myself to use this lens exclusively, and it's about a 50% crop:
That's with the camera setting aperture to f/2, meaning the real aperture of the combo is f/2.8. I think I have a prett good handle on the things that can ruin an image for me - focus, camera shake, motion blur, flare. When I shoot other lenses, I might see those show up, but I basically never see a shot ruined that I can't attribute to something like that, and I still expect at least half my shots to succeed on a technical level. With the 50/TC combo, basically, *nothing* worked, and shots like the one above seemed to indicate to me that the lens really was the limiting factor.
As a point of reference, here's the most similar shot I can find from the DA70 - same location, same aperture, and also about a 50% crop, but actually a higher ISO and yet also a slower shutter speed, because the light was a bit lower:
This is in itself, needless to say, hardly the most impressive concert shot I've ever taken, but it's the one that seems to do the best job of matching the rest of the variables (even though it's still far from perfect.
Anyhow, you be the judge.