Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
01-18-2010, 05:36 AM   #1
New Member
Rafalas's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Palma de Mallorca, SPAIN
Posts: 21
New Lens: Prime or Zoom?

Hi there!

I'm thinking about getting a good wide angle lens. I definitely want an autofocus lens, and I'm considering getting the SMC Pentax-FA 28mm F2.8 AL, the SMC Pentax-F 28mm F2.8, or another good 28mm or 24mm lens. I want specifically those focal lenghts as that's what I normally use and because I think I can get something like this in the price range I want to spend, between 200 and 250$.
I want it to be prime because I'm looking for sharpness and color rendition, and I know those have very good qualifications in that field.

My doubts come when I've seen very good reviews for the Tamron AF 17-50mm f/2.8 SP XR Di II LD Aspherical, on which is mentioned that this lens have really good sharpness and color rendition. This lens is slightly above my price range, but I wonder if the sharpness of this lens is equal to that on the prime 28mm when using the same focal. If that was the case, or very similar, then I'll get the Tamron giving the fact that it offers me more than the prime in relation.

What do you think? Do you believe the sharpness of the Tamron at 28mm is equal, or very similar, to that on a 28mm prime?

Thanks everyone for your help.

01-18-2010, 07:17 AM   #2
Veteran Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Elmira, On, Canada
Posts: 457
Can't fully answer your question, but I thought I'd put in my 2 cents.

I have a FA28/2.8 and a 21/3.2 ltd. For the past year or so, I've been toying with picking up a Tamron17-50, to get something on the wider end, and still retain the speed. Haven't done it yet, largely because of the size. I'm usually carrying my 50-135 mounted on my K10D with grip, and the 28 & 21 tucked in separate pouches in my bag. Getting the (much bigger) 17-50 would force me to review my carrying system.

(plus, I really like being able to grab my small DS with the 21 or 28 or 50 mounted for a compact system).

I have no idea how the 28/2.8 compares to the 17-50 in terms of image quality. The FA28/2.8 is good to my eyes.

Just food for thought.
01-18-2010, 07:39 AM   #3
Veteran Member
rustynail925's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Philippines
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,551
I cant say about the sharpness of the Tamron vs FA 28mm but given both are f2.8
it will be the choice of range against size/weight /price
My vote is on the tamron 17-50 2.8
01-18-2010, 08:33 AM   #4
Veteran Member

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 337
My vote would be for the Tamron 17-50mm as well. I love this lens. And frankly, it is smaller and lighter than you might think it would be.

01-18-2010, 08:47 AM   #5
New Member
Rafalas's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Palma de Mallorca, SPAIN
Posts: 21
Original Poster
Thanks everyone,

I see the balance is falling on the side of the Tamron. Now, is it significantly sharper and better in general than the Pentax 18-55 kit lens that comes with the K10D to justify the 300$?. I know the Tamron is significantly faster than the Pentax, but it's the sharpness what I'm really looking for.

Does the sharpness of the Tamron compare to what we can see with a Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 50mm f1.4?
01-18-2010, 08:49 AM   #6
Veteran Member
GeneV's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Albuquerque NM
Photos: Albums
Posts: 9,829
What body will you be using? What other lenses do you own?

My first purchases (after the kit lens that came with my first DSLR body) were primes. I might have gone for a fast 28mm (wide normal on aps/c) if I hadn't had one from the film days already. Though I use zooms, I tend to value weight, lens speed and quality (less a factor with zooms, today) over the inconvenience of zooming with my feet.
01-18-2010, 09:14 AM   #7
New Member
Rafalas's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Palma de Mallorca, SPAIN
Posts: 21
Original Poster
I own a K10D, and I'm a lover of the old Takumars. I have Super-Multi-Coated versions of the 50mm f1.4, 135mm f3.5 and 100mm f4 macro. Apart of those, I have the 18-55mm kit lens, a Sigma 70-300mm and a Tamron 18-250mm.

So far, I've used mostly the Tamron 18-250mm for daily and trip photos, and the Takumars for creative photography. What I'm looking for is a lens to carry more frequently, and more on the wide angle range, with which I can obtain the quality that I do with the Takumars, but having automatic focus so I can basically "point and shoot".

Again, thanks everyone for your advice!

  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
28mm, color, f2.8, k-mount, lens, pentax lens, price, range, rendition, sharpness, slr lens, smc, tamron
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is the advantage of 21/35/40 prime vs a f2.8 zoom lens raider Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 23 06-21-2010 10:57 AM
Prime & Zoom Lens Question LadyRo Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 9 06-01-2010 06:34 PM
Seeking wide-angle lens - Zoom or Prime? pentaman Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 20 11-12-2009 12:42 PM
Landscape lens - prime or zoom? mutedphotos Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 29 02-12-2009 10:40 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:57 AM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]