Thanks for the comments so far.
I think the varifying notations (BBAR, 01F, etc..) for same TC's confused me.
Any thoughts on the 90mm 2.8 vs 2.5?
Originally posted by Stringmike I use the same lens mostly without a TC, but have tested it with the Adaptall 1.4 TC. This provides a very nice 100mm to 300mm combination. I've also used it with the Pentax 1.7AF TC and find it does autofocus very well, but the combination is a tad soft at the long end. I would venture that the 2x TC might push the lens a bit far.
Mike
I think you are right. I did notice that 4.0 is a lot sharper than 3.5 on the lens. Also, it PF/CAs with the best of them wide open.
I guess I should look for a 1.4TC, a 100 to 300mm lens would be nice. Or cropping would work, too.
Thanks again for all opinions.