Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
02-17-2010, 09:23 AM   #1
Junior Member




Join Date: Feb 2010
Photos: Albums
Posts: 39
Which 30 to 35?

This my first post here. I've found the information on the site useful and thorough. This is more in the nature of making a decision than figuring out specifications.
I love my FA50 for its speed, weight and IQ. But it is a tad too tele on the KX and I want a fast 30 or 35 prime to take its place.
These appear to be the options:
SMC Pentax-FA 31mm F1.8 AL Limited: Perfect/too expensive/divorce inducing
DA 35 f2.8: Too slow, too much.
Sigma 30 1.4 Perfect specs and price but too heavy.
FA 35 2.0 Close but overpriced for plastic. Should have bought one a couple of years ago when I got the K100
Do I want to try a manual lens? KEH has a number in my price range. As I understand it, these won't autofocus, but will prompt me with the usual beep/focus icon when I'm in focus.
Any significant diffferences between:
35 F2 SMC (52) 35MM SLR MANUAL FOCUS WIDE ANGLE LENS
35 F2 SMC A (49) 35MM SLR MANUAL FOCUS WIDE ANGLE LENS
35 F2 SMC M (49) WITH CAPS 35MM SLR MANUAL FOCUS WIDE ANGLE LENS
The first lens commands about a $100 price premium over the other two.
Thanks in advance.

02-17-2010, 10:53 AM   #2
Pentaxian
Just1MoreDave's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Aurora, CO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 4,862
The SMC Pentax 35mm f2 has a pretty good reputation and is generally considered better than the M or A version. (We tend to call it the K version, though the label on the lens doesn't say K, because all the other lens series have letter designations, and doesn't come across well.) Here's a test on film between the K35/2 and the FA35/2:

http://www.takinami.com/yoshihiko/photo/fa35/FAvsK.html

I owned the M version briefly (optically the same formula as the A) and the FA seems a lot better to me. No detailed comparisons, though.

You could add in 28mm lenses and get a few more choices, but many people are facing the same problem: no obvious lens in the normal range. I don't think the FA 35/2 is worth its current new list price either, but besides price, it is a very good lens.
02-18-2010, 02:38 AM   #3
Veteran Member




Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,352
If you think buying a FA 31 is divorce-inducing, you should try losing one!

I can see myself getting another though.
02-18-2010, 04:45 AM   #4
Inactive Account




Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,972
Just for the record the Sigma 30mm is not heavy by any means. I wouldn't consider this a deal breaker for anyone...and I, for one, am not into heavy lenses.

c[_]

02-18-2010, 04:56 AM   #5
Senior Member
apemen's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ankara, TURKEY
Posts: 182
QuoteOriginally posted by ll_coffee_lP Quote
Just for the record the Sigma 30mm is not heavy by any means. I wouldn't consider this a deal breaker for anyone...and I, for one, am not into heavy lenses.

c[_]
I second that,
it is heavier than DA Limiteds but which lens is not
02-18-2010, 05:20 AM   #6
Veteran Member




Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 359
The K 30mm F2.8 is also an option. It's supposed to be very sharp.
F2.8 should really be fast enough when you have the KX (excellent ISO performance).

Kind regards
.lars

Last edited by Recercare; 02-18-2010 at 05:26 AM.
02-18-2010, 05:40 AM   #7
Site Supporter




Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Gladys, Virginia
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 16,243
Sounds like you should go for the Sigma. Just a comment on the DA 35 -- it is really not that slow. Even on lenses that shoot faster, I tend to use them at f2.8 or stopped down more if I can, just for depth of field. On the Kx as mentioned above, you can easily push up iso to 3200 and maybe 6400 and get decent shutter speeds, making lenses like the DA 40 and 35 very reasonable purchases.
02-18-2010, 07:11 AM   #8
Veteran Member




Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston, PRofMA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,053
another vote for the sigma 30/1.4...a friend has it on Nikon and it has surprisingly good bokeh...

02-18-2010, 09:04 AM   #9
Junior Member




Join Date: Feb 2010
Photos: Albums
Posts: 39
Original Poster
wife or lens?
02-18-2010, 06:29 PM   #10
Veteran Member
barbosas's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lisbon
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 683
QuoteOriginally posted by LouD Quote
wife or lens?
variable (and unknown) cost vs fixed cost?


i would go for the lens

Last edited by barbosas; 02-18-2010 at 07:28 PM.
02-18-2010, 07:08 PM   #11
Veteran Member
tokyoso's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Tokyo
Photos: Albums
Posts: 723
hidden message: buy your husband (or wife) a lens.
02-18-2010, 10:30 PM   #12
Veteran Member
Pentaxor's Avatar

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 6,513
QuoteOriginally posted by LouD Quote
wife or lens?
I need a financier, so the answer is quite obvious.
02-18-2010, 11:52 PM   #13
Veteran Member




Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: La Crescenta, CA
Posts: 7,452
The Sigma and the DA35 are both incredible lenses. I rarely find the 35 to be too slow.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
angle, f2, focus, k-mount, lens, pentax lens, price, slr, slr lens, smc
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:27 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top