Digital makes life easier and is faster and gives that on a smaller system. Theses are the differences to me.
Instant review, HDR, PP for highlights/shadows, Dodge/Burn, etc all are easier and faster on digital.
For resolution, I think both are well able to make it for magazine sized prints.
However, personally, the 8R prints I've made with my RB67 has been the nicest I've ever printed for that size (beats all that I've taken with my DSLRs).
Metering and instant review can be sort of replicated with film cams by taking a preview shot with a digi cam that shows EXIF info.
To me, scanning is a pain. I can't be bothered nowadays with a scanner. The need to be careful with dust, film height, long scan times is too much for my schedules.
I digitize it nowadays with my K5 and 100/2.8 macro and they are very decent for most purposes.
If I find a print worth the effort/cost, I will print it.
At the end for me, the MF cameras are just not for everyday use (too big and slow).
More of a side hobby when I can take my time and setup the shots. Beautiful results on print.
I'd suggest going 'dual system'