Originally posted by Nesster Now wouldn't it be a shame if it turned out to be 645D compatible only.... nah, can't be...
I've heard tale of an image circulating that shows it being used with a K3 .
---------- Post added 02-07-14 at 12:55 AM ----------
Originally posted by rrstuff I would say let's wait and see about the quality. A proper scanner would probably be higher quality, but this solution would be very quick.
I think time and money are the two venues where this beats dedicated scanners. You get 80% of the quality and save lots of time and money. I guess we'll have to wait and see price wise.