Originally posted by boriscleto A 35mm movie splicer won't help you unless you find one for 35mm double frame. 35mm full frame in cinema terms is what still shooters call 35mm half frame..
Huh? Why should it matter? You're cutting between the frames in either case.
The VistaVision wide-screen process turned the image on the negative to the same orientation as still cameras but the same splicers were used on the negatives. The image was again turned and usually optically "squeezed" anamorphically for the projection prints.
Widescreen Museum - The VistaVision Wing Quote: John R. Bishop, head of Paramount's camera and film processing departments acquired a William Fox "Natural Color" camera built in the late 1920's by the William P. Stein company. This camera exposed two frames of film at the same time through color filters. Bishop cut out the separation between the two frames, rolled the camera over on its side and fitted it with Leica 35mm still camera lenses. This camera, dubbed the "Lazy-8" because it pulled the film across horizontally in 8 perforation frames, provided a total negative area 2.66 times greater than the conventional 35mm camera with a 1.66:1 aspect ratio.
You can see contact prints made from the VistaVision camera negative from Alfred Hitchcock's "Vertigo" vs 65mm interpositive and 35mm print.
Widescreen Museum - The VistaVision Wing 5
This page shows the ubiquitous C.I.R. ("Ciro") film splicer in use. You can splice the film at any length you wish.
Riparazione e restauro pellicole : Telecinema