Hello,
I started photography again using the film camera my father taught me how to take a shot manually. I am using a Pentax MX with a 50mm f1.4.
I shot two rolls of Tri-x 400 for the first time to see how it feels. One roll was shot at ISO 400 the other was pushed to 1600.
First picture with issue showing white marks at the height of the hands
Second picture with issue showing where the tree is vertically white marks and a white shade.
I would like to point that these marks appear in another 4 -5 pictures among 72.
The third picture is a scanned picture with no issues, at ISO 400.
Question A
Are these marks an issue of the person developing and scanning the film ?
Question B
The following link has a picture using Tri-x
P10 copie | m_p13 | Flickr
I think that it does not have the same amount of grain as mine. Mine is totally untouched. Is it an issue of post process ?
Thank you for your feedback. I am just trying to understand how clean is the clean look of Tri-x, especially since I mainly shot Ilford HP5 since now. I dont know if its the development and scan process or post process issues that make my pictures differ from the ones I see online.