Originally posted by JohnMc Please find a way to show the film strips including the border/edges and details of the processing.
These may not be great photos, but you can see the light leak in the lower left corner of each frame of the negative strips. It appears as a blackish splotch and is particularly visible near (but perhaps not within?) the gaps / spacing between frames.
As for the processing, I can't provide full details because I sent the film off to be developed at a local photolab. The filmstock is Fomapan Action 400, and I did not ask the photolab to push or pull anything, so I assume the processing was usual B&W fare.
---------- Post added 03-10-22 at 12:15 PM ----------
Originally posted by Alex645 IF the light leak appears in the same area of multiple frames, then it's probably a light leak in the film chamber door. The lens when recording the image onto the negative will flip the image both vertically and horizontally, so if the light on the neg/print shows up in the top right corner, the leak is coming from somewhere in the bottom left of the door as you hold the camera with the lens facing forward.
Inspect the inside of the door for a dent or missing foam etc. The pressure plate should be parallel to the back.
The 'seals' are actually some mildly decaying wool around the film door. But it all looks to be in relatively good shape, aside from one small section. Could be the culprit...
Originally posted by Alex645 Another possibility is that leaf shutter is 'sticking' and not closing completely. It may just need to be "loosened up" a bit. Without film, just take lots of 'shots' so that the shutter goes through many operations and that may loosen up the blades enough.
I'm starting to wonder if sticky shutter blades may actually be the problem, given my other difficulties with the slower shutter speeds (1/30th second and slower).
Originally posted by Alex645 If the light leak appears in different areas of the negatives, then that could be 'user error', but from the one example you posted, it doesn't look like that.
We can rule this out, I think!
---------- Post added 03-10-22 at 12:18 PM ----------
Originally posted by photoptimist The first rule for light leaks is:
1a) if the image of the leak is strongly confined to the exposed frame, then the source of the leak probably comes from the lens-side of the camera
1b) if the image of the leak covers the borders and gaps outside the exposed frame, then the source of the leak probably comes from the back-side of the camera
The second rule is:
2a) if the image of the leak is on the bottom of the exposed frame, then the source of the leak probably on the top of the camera
2a) if the image of the leak is on the top of the exposed frame, then the source of the leak probably on the bottom of the camera
The third rule is:
3a) if the image of the leak spreads all across the exposed frame, then the source of the leak probably in the door or hinge.
3a) if the image of the leak spreads along the edge of the exposed frame, then the source of the leak probably on the edge of the camera.
Finally, tracing a leak means thinking like a photon (which is a useful skill for any photographer!). That means thinking of all the place light might get in, the path it takes, what other things in the camera might block the light, and where it ends up on the film.
Thank you so much for spelling everything out so well for me! As mentioned, I'm new to film photography, so I'm still trying to learn the fundamentals. Your details will certainly get me thinking!
In general, I'm starting to think the leak may be solved by [1(a)] of your above list!