Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version 22 Likes Search this Thread
10-19-2022, 11:23 AM   #1
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Alex645's Avatar

Join Date: May 2015
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,527
X-TOL issues?

I have been using Kodak X-TOL for more than 20 years. Before I used D-76, but found X-TOL a notch above in terms of grain, with speed and price a consideration as well.

On my last three batches, with 80°F water, I could not completely dissolve the powder no matter how long I tried. There were still more specks of undissolved Part A no matter how long I continued to mix it.

After mixing the rest with Part B and the additional water to make 5 liters, I found the developer so weak, I had to use it straight to get results that I normally would see with a 1:1 dilution.

The packaging is dated for what I presume as expiration for Feb. 2023 and in fine print says Made in Germany.

Question #1: Has anyone else encountered this issue recently?

I teach B&W film photography to about 20-60 students per year. I am seriously considering switching to another developer that is more reliable. We typically develop a range of films including Kodak Tri-X and TMax, Ilford Pan F, HP5+, and Delta, and sometimes Kentmere and Arista. We also push process.

Question #2: Any recommendations for a replacement developer? My local supplier carries D76 (potential same Kodak issues as X-TOL?), HC-110, Rodinal, TMax, Ilford ID-11 and DDX.

HC-110 seems viable if I can get students (ages 13-17) to consistently prep the working solution 1:63. Using a stock solution that keeps for a semester at 1:1 dilution helps reduce mistakes.

10-19-2022, 12:26 PM - 1 Like   #2
Moderator
Not a Number's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 10,526
Has anything changed with your water supply? Are you using water straight from the tap? Could the state or municipality have started adding fluoridation?

When the water supply here started be fluoridated a lot of things were affected. I got a Reverse Osmosis filter and it made a big difference.

Try making a batch with distilled water.
10-19-2022, 12:43 PM - 1 Like   #3
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 659
Maybe bump the (mixing) temp up 5°. Using a consistent and better quality water is important. If you run a dehumidifier they are a great source -good and cheap so long as the system is clean. Another thing that can be done with city tap is to let it breath for for a day or three before using and letting the volatiles (chlorine) flash off (fluoride is not readily removed w/o RO).
10-19-2022, 01:15 PM - 2 Likes   #4
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Caledon, Ontario, Canada
Photos: Albums
Posts: 504
I will second the recommendation to use distilled water to mix. At C$6.00 for a 5 gallon jug, it's cheap enough not to matter. I use this with all my powder developers now, including Xtol, as my area has very hard water with lots of dissolved calcium carbonate (lime) and iron. I believe Xtol is particularly susceptible to water impurities, but I have only heard this in relation to longevity of the stock solution.... not sure about mixing problems.

For an alternative all-purpose developer, it's hard to go wrong with D-76. It may give slightly coarser grain than Xtol, but it has really great tonality - lots of guts and punchy tones, esp. if used at 1+1 dilution (one-shot development). Works great with all the films you listed. In fact, being the world's most popular developer, film manufacturers work to ensure that their films will look good in D76. FYI, Ilford ID-11 is effectively the same thing as D76.

I wouldn't recommend Rodinal for the higher speed films - TriX and HP5 - as the grain will be really harsh. Also, Rodinal needs very gentle agitation to tame the contrast, so that's a deviation from typical Ilford or Kodak agitation regimens. It can be a tricky beast for students to master, so maybe not the best choice for learners.

Hope this helps.

10-19-2022, 01:30 PM   #5
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Alex645's Avatar

Join Date: May 2015
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,527
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by Not a Number Quote
Has anything changed with your water supply? Are you using water straight from the tap? Could the state or municipality have started adding fluoridation?

When the water supply here started be fluoridated a lot of things were affected. I got a Reverse Osmosis filter and it made a big difference.

Try making a batch with distilled water.
That's interesting, and the water is from the tap but:
a) My state does fluoridate the water.
b) Our school actually has its own water source, a spring and aquifer, and the only thing added may be chlorine in the water tank. As it's the source for mostly children K-12 and teachers, the quality is highly monitored.
c) Yes, we do use filters and compared to when I used municipal water in California, there is very little sediment. I replace filters once a year, and they are still fairly clean.

Next time I make a batch of stock, I will try using distilled water to eliminate that as a possible cause.

---------- Post added 10-19-22 at 01:33 PM ----------

QuoteOriginally posted by JohnMc Quote
Maybe bump the (mixing) temp up 5°. Using a consistent and better quality water is important. If you run a dehumidifier they are a great source -good and cheap so long as the system is clean. Another thing that can be done with city tap is to let it breath for for a day or three before using and letting the volatiles (chlorine) flash off (fluoride is not readily removed w/o RO).
If this was a one-off problem, I would suspect the water, but it's been going on now for over a year with the last three batches of stock. Also, I know the taste and smell of chlorine and relative to municipal water, our private spring aquifer water is good enough to be bottled as is.

Because Kodak suggests 64-80°F, I fear going over 80° may cause other side effects. I have been mixing them at 80°.

Last edited by Alex645; 10-19-2022 at 01:35 PM.
10-19-2022, 01:39 PM   #6
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pugetopolis
Posts: 11,032
If you are happy with XTOL, test out another purchase of it from someone else to maybe avoid the same bad batch of it. It sounds like you have only experienced this one bad package so far.
10-19-2022, 02:10 PM - 2 Likes   #7
Pentaxian
disconnekt's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SoCal/I.E.
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,702
Here's one thread on another photo forum of a couple people having similiar issues back in 2020, (probably more if you dig around on there): https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/bad-xtol.177020/

10-19-2022, 03:26 PM - 1 Like   #8
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
ChrisPlatt's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rockaway Beach NYC
Posts: 7,702
I too recommend using distilled water to mix your developer.

Chris
10-19-2022, 04:43 PM   #9
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Alex645's Avatar

Join Date: May 2015
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,527
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by disconnekt Quote
Here's one thread on another photo forum of a couple people having similiar issues back in 2020, (probably more if you dig around on there): https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/bad-xtol.177020/
Yes, what I read in the thread is exactly what I'm dealing with. In the past when you mix X-TOL, Part A turns orange (with no particles) and then when you add Part B, it momentarily turns purple and then clear.

It's as if they changed the chems without changing the name or giving any notice. And with every developer I've worked with, the potency is strongest when fresh, and then slowly fades. With X-TOL it's almost as if it gains potency with age. We're not talking about wine....or are we?

Right now, leaning toward switching to D-76, but I still have some X-TOL powder A+B left and will try the distilled water before giving up.

---------- Post added 10-19-22 at 04:46 PM ----------

QuoteOriginally posted by tuco Quote
If you are happy with XTOL, test out another purchase of it from someone else to maybe avoid the same bad batch of it. It sounds like you have only experienced this one bad package so far.
Actually not the same batch and I've been talking locally to other X-TOL users and they've encountered this problem too. I fear Kodak went from the gold standard to pyrite.
10-19-2022, 05:16 PM   #10
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 659
QuoteOriginally posted by Alex645 Quote
That's interesting, and the water is from the tap but:
a) My state does fluoridate the water.
b) Our school actually has its own water source, a spring and aquifer, and the only thing added may be chlorine in the water tank. As it's the source for mostly children K-12 and teachers, the quality is highly monitored.
c) Yes, we do use filters and compared to when I used municipal water in California, there is very little sediment. I replace filters once a year, and they are still fairly clean.

Next time I make a batch of stock, I will try using distilled water to eliminate that as a possible cause.

---------- Post added 10-19-22 at 01:33 PM ----------



If this was a one-off problem, I would suspect the water, but it's been going on now for over a year with the last three batches of stock. Also, I know the taste and smell of chlorine and relative to municipal water, our private spring aquifer water is good enough to be bottled as is.

Because Kodak suggests 64-80°F, I fear going over 80° may cause other side effects. I have been mixing them at 80°.
Huh, I get


1. Start with an amount of water that is approximately
75 percent of the total volume indicated on the
package. See the table above. The water should be at
normal room temperature, about 65 to 85°F (18 to
30°C).


About would mean it only needs to be warm enough to dissolve readily. "About" could be 90°... maybe. Do you check the pH of the tap water?
10-19-2022, 05:39 PM   #11
Pentaxian




Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 836
One benefit of XTOL is you do not need to use warm water, it will dissolve with room temperature water.
10-19-2022, 07:41 PM   #12
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: May 2007
Location: Flagstaff, Arizona
Posts: 1,649
QuoteOriginally posted by Alex645 Quote
With X-TOL it's almost as if it gains potency with age. We're not talking about wine....or are we?
Probably best not to drink it, though!!
10-20-2022, 01:19 AM - 1 Like   #13
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
fs999's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Luxembourg
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 8,648
You can also try Caffenol to teach alternative development to your students.
10-20-2022, 01:46 AM - 1 Like   #14
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Alex645's Avatar

Join Date: May 2015
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,527
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by fs999 Quote
You can also try Caffenol to teach alternative development to your students.
Back in the '80s, I had a classmate in Film School who had attended the University of Bath. They had a class where the entire process of creating a camera, an image, and making a permanent print were all done with found materials; nothing store bought or a photographic product.

As prices of film and photo chems get higher and higher, it becomes more tempting to consider an entire curriculum using non-toxic locally found materials that don't require the sort of carbon footprint that goes into most commercial products.

The very first assignment is having them making pinhole cameras, so it would be a natural to keeping the processes and materials low tech.
10-20-2022, 07:54 PM - 1 Like   #15
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Digitalis's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 11,695
QuoteOriginally posted by Alex645 Quote
Right now, leaning toward switching to D-76
D-76 is what the darkroom students at my photography school use, for the more advanced students we teach them to make their own developers. Despite the hazards involved I'm always a fan of the Pyrocatechol option.

QuoteOriginally posted by ChrisPlatt Quote
I too recommend using distilled water to mix your developer.
If this doesn't work, it is indicative that the chemistry is off somehow. With the temperatures and volumes you are working with the solubility of the powders really shouldn't be an issue.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
batch, cause, changes, chemistry, chlorine, clean, developer, dilution, film, hc-110, ilford, kodak, matter, methods, one-off, people, photography, quality, solution, source, stock, tap, thread, tmax, water

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pentax K-3II and Sigma 17-70mm AF issues? 12345 Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 5 01-13-2022 12:10 PM
Autotofocus and Tracking in Mirrorless Cameras -- There are Issues c.a.m General Photography 9 07-20-2021 03:42 PM
K-70 time-lapse issues Ikaikatf Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 8 05-13-2021 11:00 AM
Issues with batteries. Lynnec53 Pentax K-r 7 04-20-2021 12:04 AM
Pentax 6x7 Issues with Focusing / 75mm Lens LoganJ Pentax Medium Format 11 10-25-2020 05:37 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:35 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top