K-5, ISO200 vs ISO3200, Sampled from RAW PP/NR: OFF - Page 3 - PentaxForums.com

The Latest

Reply

Page 3 of 3

3

Search this Thread

10-29-2010, 04:38 AM	#31
Jodokast96 Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Erial, NJ USA Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 2,134	Yeah, sorry. I guess that may have been a better way to explain it. I was just trying to keep as much math out of it as possible.

Reply

Page 3 of 3

3

« Handheld 5 shot HDR w/ K-5 and sigma 10-20mm | K-5 low iso comparison opinions please »

Bookmarks

Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!

camera, dslr, image, iso200, iso3200, k-5, k-5 ii, k-5 iis, k5, nr, pentax k-5, size

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
K-x and K200D iso200	planedriver	Pentax DSLR Discussion	23	01-20-2010 12:22 PM
first k-x ISO3200 photo	devorama	Pentax DSLR Discussion	6	10-01-2009 02:01 PM
Fuji Superia ISO200	Gooshin	Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras	17	01-25-2009 01:14 PM
The Need for ISO1600 and ISO3200	racinsince55	Pentax DSLR Discussion	29	03-29-2007 10:43 AM
EV range, and ISO200-3200 v.s. 100-1600	kmccanta	Pentax DSLR Discussion	6	03-07-2007 05:17 PM

Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?

Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]