Are 14 bits enough to capture the full K-5 dynamic range?

Class A · 11-05-2010, 08:34 PM

Originally posted by falconeye

Can somebody please consider starting a petition against this nonsense?

I created a corresponding protest post, entitled "Skimlinks -- Is there no end to the commercialisation?".

Last edited by Class A; 11-06-2010 at 10:47 PM.

RonHendriks1966 · 11-06-2010, 04:00 AM

Originally posted by falconeye

Note

In my above post, I see a link to Sony (Sonystyle) which I did not write. I will investigate the case. Should I find out that Adam deliberately empowered the forum software to alter my intellectual property to contain commercial links, then this will have consequnces.

EDIT
It is not happening in this post. I did not type or copy paste the link. I don't know what happened. If I edit the post, I see no link. Do others see the link too? I'm currently on an ipad which sometimes marks text like phone numbers too.

No link here! Thanks for your answer.

falconeye · 11-06-2010, 04:16 AM

Originally posted by RonHendriks1966

No link here! Thanks for your answer.

You're right, the link is gone for mee too. Maybe Adam, or the company providing the skim links, changed something. As I understand, the skim links are written by javascript and therefore, theoretically could change based on time zone, click rate etc. Just like any other ad.

Anyway, I think the skimword issue can further be discussed in the thread Class A created and I am glad to know that Adam is taking care. It wasn't Adam's intention to have such links.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Improving K7 dynamic range	Tony3d	Pentax DSLR Discussion	23	10-12-2010 03:27 PM
Dynamic Range on the K-x	Shahmatt	Pentax DSLR Discussion	33	04-22-2010 03:51 PM
Dynamic Range	Rene`	Pentax DSLR Discussion	6	09-25-2008 07:46 AM
K10D dynamic range	drwho9437	Pentax DSLR Discussion	15	07-15-2008 02:47 PM
Dynamic Range	Vlad	Photographic Technique	5	06-01-2008 10:40 PM

11-05-2010, 08:34 PM	#31
Class A Pentaxian Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Wellington, New Zealand Posts: 11,251	Originally posted by falconeye Can somebody please consider starting a petition against this nonsense? I created a corresponding protest post, entitled "Skimlinks -- Is there no end to the commercialisation?". Last edited by Class A; 11-06-2010 at 10:47 PM.

11-06-2010, 04:00 AM	#32
RonHendriks1966 Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Photos: Gallery Posts: 9,675	Originally posted by falconeye Note In my above post, I see a link to Sony (Sonystyle) which I did not write. I will investigate the case. Should I find out that Adam deliberately empowered the forum software to alter my intellectual property to contain commercial links, then this will have consequnces. EDIT It is not happening in this post. I did not type or copy paste the link. I don't know what happened. If I edit the post, I see no link. Do others see the link too? I'm currently on an ipad which sometimes marks text like phone numbers too. No link here! Thanks for your answer.

11-06-2010, 04:16 AM	#33
falconeye Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Munich, Alps, Germany Photos: Gallery Posts: 6,871	Originally posted by RonHendriks1966 No link here! Thanks for your answer. You're right, the link is gone for mee too. Maybe Adam, or the company providing the skim links, changed something. As I understand, the skim links are written by javascript and therefore, theoretically could change based on time zone, click rate etc. Just like any other ad. Anyway, I think the skimword issue can further be discussed in the thread Class A created and I am glad to know that Adam is taking care. It wasn't Adam's intention to have such links.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
	Search this Thread: Advanced Search