Looking back on my post of a day or so ago it seems a little pissy. Sorry for that. I should explain that when I saw the piece released my heart soared to dizzying heights, as I am literally starving for news of this body, and trying to decide how long I can stand to wait for it. The crash after reading probably contributed to my tone.
The other reason that I took serious issue with how it was presented is because this is, though I've only lurked of late, one of my favourite corners of the net, and I would like to see it prosper. For the reasons I laid out I worry that content like this will not serve the pentaxians well enough (they know most of it through rabid info-mining) while at the same time turning off people who come to this through a search for 'review' on google. It would be a shame if content like this which is so labouriously and lovingly crafted were to actually detriment the reputation of PF.
The people it really does serve, though, are those who have just heard of this crazy idea called pentax, and for them it really really does lay out the whole system in an exciting and accessible way, were it but titled differently.
The side by sides did put me 2% closer to convincing the wife though. Just need a K10 ISO 1600 sample there too to put the last nail in the coffin
Originally posted by osv ....i didn't watch the videos, but criticizing their use indicates a fundamental lack of knowledge of how the internet operates... youtube is the second biggest search engine, this forum needs to have content up there, and you need to have the proper links to the videos for search engine purposes.
That is a very good point, . Hadn't considered that.
Fundamentally yours,