Originally posted by robgo2 Enjoy it while you can, because when Nikon releases the D400, I expect the reviews to be even more glowing. Not that it will necessarily be a better camera than the K-5, but that reviewers are conditioned to ranking Nikon and Canon above Pentax. And what does it really matter? We all know that the K-5 is a winner.
Rob
Well, I hear ya and there's only one way I can see Pentax changes this:
1) Expand market share (TAKE IT FROM CANIKON) by competitive prices for high quality equipment.
2) Expand lens line (Why must I buy a long lens from Sigma?????) to be competitive (notice I did not say directly compete) with Canikon
3) Market the product (love this site - but I think this site does more for marketing Pentax than Pentax does...). Do this by doing the following:
a) Directly compare products - it's worth doing especially when old glass is factored in!
b) Do this little thing called advertise
c) Court pros who publish photos and get some published from Pentax equipment
d) Did I say advertise?
e) Court the magazines like Canikon does
f) Ummm...advertise some more
So I digress...(did I say market the product in any way)...the conditioning you mentioned is a result of Canikon courting the reviewers, magazines, pro photographers, and all the others supposedly 'in the know'. Canikon sells good products - I don't question that. So does Pentax - they need to play at least a some component of the game if they plan to successfully remain in business. That's why this matters. If Pentax doesn't maintain a viable business we all lose...