Originally posted by abacus07 Congrats on the new purchase. And welcome to the money pit. Just plan on wearing a hard hat (preferably with a face shield) because you're going to want a lot of stuff.
but the good news is that if you're a careful shopper it's almost impossible not to be able to sell a Pentax (or other name brand) lens for the purchase price (or more).
I probably would have recommended going with a used K20D or a new/used K-r/K-x so you could accelerate acquiring your kit. And there is so much more than just buying the camera and lens. I just dropped $300 on a CF tripod (for hiking/backpacking) and have spent almost the same amount on filters (2 POL (49 and 52) and a 2, 3 and 10 stop ND). Add a lenspen and blower plus the Pentax sensor cleaning kit. A bigger card isn't really needed but a 2nd/3rd card permanently stored in your camera bag is. I ALWAYS forget my card in the computer. You'll need/want computer software although I've taken on the challenge of learning the excellent and free but difficult GIMP. A strong enough computer is needed. I'm sure this list could go on forever.
I've got the lens pen and sensor cleaning kit on the 'future list.' I'm not worried about the software or the computer, as I work in the tech field. i have an S-IPS LCD, core i7 quad Macbook, and get heavy discounts on Adobe and other software, plus GIMP is always an option. I've got a tripod, and it will have to do, at least for a time. If someone starts paying me to take pics, I can go look at CF..
The K-x might have been a good alternative except for the lack of weather-proofing and the amount of time we spend in nature, but hey, there's always the possibility of my wife 'adopting' the K5.
At which point, i may well find myself looking for a used K7 or K20 in the future. I just read someone's thread who has been using a *ist D for some 5 years, and has taken some amazing pictures.
Originally posted by abacus07: I would not recommend using my lens acquisition strategy. I'm single and can get away with it. I'm impulsive on Ebay and have used zero long-term planning.
I can relate. Married life has me doing much more planning and watching where I might be wasting money, but it helps that my wife is onboard with the idea of finally going DSLR. How much she remains onboard for future lens discussions - we'll see. If nothing else, there's always some $ we always spend on each other's hobbies, it's just a matter of how fast or slow something like a $500+ lens might work out..
Originally posted by abacus07: Everybody will be different but a basic prime/zoom combo strategy - of course everyone's interests are different. A portrait photographer might want several different 50/70/100mm lenses with big apertures. I'm a landscape photographer and I'm overloaded with 24-50mm lenses (and soon a DA15).
WA (prime or zoom) - DA15, Sigma 10-20, Pentax 12-24, Tamron 10-24, etc... - pretty much there are no cheap options for really good WA's on DSLR - 400-600
A normal 28-35mm - the DA L 35 is a great bang for the buck as is the FA 35/2 or DA40 - 200-350 - a lot of great choices at every price level from M28/2.8 ($40) to the FA31 (900ish)
fast fifty - you have a great one but will probably want AF for this focal length (I really do) - F50/1.7-FA50/1.4 - 200-350
90-105mm (macro?) - these seem to be great multipurpose lenses - macro/telephoto/portrait - 200-500
Zooms that I'm indefinitely delaying
A general purpose zoom upgrade - sigma 24-70/2.8 or Tamron 28-75/2.8 would be my current choice
A telephoto zoom starting at the 55-300 and getting much, much more expensive
Noted for the future
Looking at some of the shots people have posted, I'm quite positive it will be neither the camera nor the lenses I've chosen holding me back 'for some time yet.'
I'll see how the 50 and the 18-55 work out for daylight outdoor shots, but I expect to be using the zoom fairly often as well outdoors. I did spend some time thinking about the lens selection, knowing this would be 'it' until at least the holidays hit, and I think I've got reasonable coverage - the pair of zooms will also give me a good idea of the percentage of time I wind up using each range in real life, letting me hopefully make a more educated and less 'someone said this is good, so I should buy it' approach. I hope so, anyways.
You may well be right on the AF on the 50, or I may wind up wanting a faster lens in the 18-35mm range, but I think I've got a good start and give me quite some time before claiming 'I don't have a lens I can get that picture with'...
Here's hoping, at least.