I am trying to avoid the tendency to blame anything but my technique
but I have been challenged to get decent shots out of this lens. Some are stunning, clear and detailed, so I know what it can do. Thinking back, some of the best shots, or even series of shots have been the rare occasions when I forget to bring my monopod and shoot hand held. The shots are as good as the light and distance can give me, and I'm not going to brag about my steady hands, which I don't have. Especially with this heavy lens and the awkward hand positions required to steady it and focus. I had one series of a bobcat in a tree about 200 ft or so away, and was blown away with the detail. Handheld.
I do get some nice shots on the monopod, but the results are not as expected. Are those the ones where the SR has had a chance to stabilize? The movement is less than hand held but mostly on one axis. I have used the monopod with a non stabilized body previously with good results, made a big improvement, so I don't think it is only my technique.
I'm typically shooting birds or wildlife, so my focus is on the subject which may move at any time, and maintaining focus. I haven't noticed or paid attention to the sr indicator, just assuming it is doing it's thing without any attention.
In any case I will try without the SR.
Is there an exif tag showing the state of the SR?