quick update - haven't been able to use the 500 on the k5 in anger just yet, hoping to get out later today and see if the local cricket club have a match on.
On the camera itself, you know it must be high-tech when the user manual weighs almost as much as the camera body
random thoughts:
I prefer the door over the pc connector of my K10 than the rubber seal used by the K5.
In portrait hold, for me the reach to the shutter button is a tiny bit awkward compared to the 10.
How much FUN is ISO52,000 !!?? I was cruising the house last night with the siggy set at 150 and the camera at full iso and rattling off shots of anything remotely dark. coupled with the quiet but rapid burst mode, the feel-good factor was high. wifey was laughing at my enthusiasm, the kids thought i was hilarious, i just had a great time. which is what it should all be about.
the AF system is far snappier than the 10's. I took the camera to a family get-together yesterday afternoon with the 10's original kit lens (DA 18-55 series 1) attached. You can feel the torque reaction as the AF drives the lens to where it wants it to be. no doubt in my mind that this is a substantially quicker system. as you'd expect.
I was a little disappointed in the IQ results from the 18-55 though. Gut feel is that the results were not as good as i usually get from the 10. Almost like the action hasn't quite been "stopped" - making everything not quite sharp- even though shutter speed was adequate. I might have a ff/rf problem, perhaps? or maybe the camera simply out-resolves a fairly old kit lens? It's the one nagging doubt i have about the camera after two days of ownership. One thing I don't have is a top-notch general range zoom to put on it. More tests/photo's required to see if i'm just imagining things.
For a K10 user, the set-up is quite intuitive. very easy transition, though i still get lost in the menu systems occasionally
Love the iso button, though with the wheels set-up in AV as i like them, it's not a absolute must-have.
Undecided whether the shake-reduction now being menu-hidden is going to be painful or not.
I turned on the highlight correction and left it there. Base iso 160 i don't think is going to worry me.
I have roughly 2,000 built-in functions still to explore
. Stumbled across the in-camera crop function last night. think that will be a handy tool for me. Looking forward to using the HDR thing. And i'm going to turn off all NR, just curious to see the effect that has. the higher iso results look a bit like film grain to me - B&W at 12,000+ might give some really interesting "old-feel" results?