Originally posted by Spodeworld Assuming it is well thought out. Just because something is in print should not in and of itself confer legitimacy. And, therefore Smeggypant's comment about the logical fallacy of assuming just because something is in print it speaks with authority.
No, print does not in and of itself confer legitimacy. However, the prestige and relevance of the outlet does lend some level of authority to specific voices in that outlet. For example, if I read an article in Nature on dSLRs I'd just laugh because it’s not their area but if I read an article on Co-enzyme A I'd take it as more authoritative due to Nature's status within that specific area. So, PCMagazine - not an authoritative source on cameras and hence no borrowed status for the writer. Nor, in my opinion has PCMagazine enhanced its authority in the camera arena with its choice of camera reviewer.