Originally posted by gooseta A few questions for you: on the "other" forum, you say you shot these as RAW & only tweaked exposure in PP? The first shot looks like a jpg to me, mostly because the sky is so blotchy and the image is soft. That may have something to do with how the images are uploaded and/or "refined" by the other site. The second one with the wall, when viewed at 100%, almost made me sick to my stomach. It's almost as if there is a double exposure going on. I notice what appear to be sharpening halos, but that could also be part of that double exposure look I was talking about. The rest of them look good, although if I had to guess, I would have said they were straight out of a II, not a IIs. I'm merely stating what I am seeing, so please don't take this the wrong way.
Thanks for posting the link to these. Please let us know if you run across anything with the new body that you really like, dislike, or is generally noteworthy.