Originally posted by marquis1955 Do you think the 17-70 glass compliments the IIs, the reviews are somewhat confusing if your talking about the Sigma 17-70, whereas the FA* 28-70 glass semms top shelf that is why I come to this forum for advise & reviews. Have you shot with a K5 and a K5iis using the 17-70 glass ? How much difference? My iis arrives today !
Good morning, Marquis... I traded in my old version of the Sigma 17-70 and, for me, I wasn't that impressed with it. Then, for what seemed like an eternity, I drove myself nuts trying to decide which lens to replace it with: the new Sigma 17-70 Contemporary or the Sigma 17-50. The 17-50, albeit older, was consistently rated higher wherever I seemed to look. And, I looked a lot. You'd probably be fine with either one but, I pulled the trigger on the 17-50 and I think I made the right decision. I read a line in one user's comments regarding the loss of 20mm on the zoom (50 vs 70) and the guy said something to the effect "just walk forward a little and you've made up the difference." Plus, the 17-50 is a constant f/2.8 through the entire range.