Originally posted by aremmes This looks like an automatically generated comparison report. Just look at the bit depth comparison: "Distinguishes 1.3 more bits of color". 1.3 bits! Of color!
I know Snapsort is not a qualified analysis of cameras - it is, as you say, just a comparison. But it always makes me smile when you see results like these - and when you look at the technical detail, some would argue they do have a point. K-30, K-50, K-5, K-3....they all 'win'. Even the K-r.
But we all know there is more to it than technical spec alone (although it IS part of the discussion). And back to the OP's remarks about the value of the Limited lenses, I think there is quite a lot to consider here. After all, we are all using kit that far exceeds anything many of the 'great' photographers ever had. Provided the person BEHIND the glass is good enough, I suspect Pentax or Leica will give you wonderful results.
That said, if anyone wanted to offer me an M6 to try for a few weeks in place of my MX, I'd certainly consider it.......