Originally posted by YJD Then why is the K-R and the D645 aren't affected by it?
It's a real question, I'm not trying to be funny.
I think the main problem is HOYA cannot give any logical explanation of why the K-5 is that more expensive. They either need to give one or lower down the price.
They don't need to do either. If you don't like the price, go buy something else.
It's pretty well documented that initial release price bears little resemblance to the street price in 6 months.
The K10 was an underpriced camera when it was released, I suspect the k20 was too, though I recall I paid around Can$1400.00 for my camera, and the K7 was, IIRC, around 1500 as well.
This is right where the K5 is, so I'm not seeing what is being complained about.
Pentax could sell these things for half that and they wouldn't sell any more of them, but they wouldn't be making any new cameras after that either.
OTOH, Nikon and Canon could put a wet turd in a box and sell it for whatever they want to get for it.
The K5 will, at best sell 1 camera for every 1000 D7000 bodies. Pentax has to charge more simply because they won't recoup their R&D investment otherwise.
People like to complain about the good old days when Pentax was cheap, but they forget that the reason they ended up being a rump company of Hoya is because they were cheap.
If they had been selling at a price that would have kept them profitable, they would still be an independent company (and people would still be complaining about the price).