Originally posted by Steelski If you are running a calibrated monitor, and they look ok for exposure, I would try recalibrating at something closer to the 100 mark, they are way underexposed.
On the last set I have to give the picture close to 2 exposures compensation to make it seem ok in terms of brightness.
Just to add, the AF is very impressive.
You are right. However in defense I was really interested in the AF on these rather than producing perfect pictures. The exposure could have been more to the right. I was in TAV mode so they should have been closer. As has been said I could have linked the exposure to the af points which would have sorted the underexposure. I really did not have the time to run all these through lightroom to correct them as I though the AF was the point.
I am really pleased with these results, if you look at the full size images in my dropbox you can see that the success rate AF wise is really good.