Originally posted by skyoftexas I'm sorry, but if you think this is a sharp photo, then either the interpretation of sharpness is very flexible, or one of us is completely wrong. This is not a compelling example of K5 sharpness.
Michael
Come on Michael !
Whatever your interpretation of sharpness (unadulterated) is I don't think anyone said that it was "perfect".
Personally, I find that image compellingly sharp to my taste and I would only guess that once printed, one would have a tough time telling me that it is not sharp.
Do you have anything, a sample shot, of an untouched, JPEG straight-out-the camera image which actually conveys your own interpretation of sharpness?
Anyway, gotta go back to business.
Cheers!
JP