Originally posted by dexmus the photos that were posted were taken in this 'real' world only
Not sure, what sort of pictures you are asking for (any sky picture will show it...) but there is one example in m80's thread (titled like - amazing amount of fill light in ISO 80). He could not get it removed by cleaning.
fanboys will be fanboys. No matter what. We should be able to point out defects in a company we love.
When someone found the flash issue, many people said - 'I never shoot with external flash. Not a real issue'
Now for this issue, many are saying 'I never shoot above f8'.
It is very similar to the Apple worship cult. When there was a reception problem with the new iPhone, people said 'Well, that's not the correct way to hold a phone', or 'I always have the cover on'...
I think tomorrow, if k-5 starts shooting fireballs and destroying all kittens in the world, people will go...meh...who likes cats, they serve no purpose
Originally posted by NaClH2O John the issue has only surfaced very recently! It does not appear readily in shots <f/16 or so. That does NOT make it a non problem. When I shoot waterfalls I almost always go to f/22 or so. Does this mean I can't take pictures of water falls? What about macro? When shooting macro I frequently get as high an f stop as possible depending on light conditions. I'm not supposed to take macros?
NaCl(I daresay that people can reproduce "normal shots" with flaws w/o too much trouble)H2O
I started the "real world" examples thread because I am sincerely interested in seeing real world examples. I take photos, you see, and sometimes get paid for them. Before plopping down my hard earned dough for the K-5, I'd like to know how widespread the string-of-pearls issue is and how it shows up in photos. If I get an affected camera and my next gig is landscapes with a lot of blue skies, then it's an issue for me. If, on the other hand, I'm doing a lot of indoor wide aperture shooting next, then maybe not so much.
Yes NaClH2O, the issue is new, but the camera's been out for several weeks and plenty of photos have been taken with them. I'm the admin to the
Pentax K-5 Fan Club on Flickr. We've got over 1600 photos there, and while I haven't looked at every one, I have yet to see the string-of-pearls. This includes
plenty of macros and
plenty of skies.
I'm not claiming that the problem doesn't exist - it clearly does. What I'm trying to understand is how prevalent it really is and how it impacts taking real photographs.
And please be careful who you call a fanboy dexmus. I've got a Pentax, but I've also got a Canon P&S, a couple of Olympus 35mm rangefinders, covet a Ricoh GXR (to replace a stolen GX100), and am leaning towards the Panny GH-2 versus the K-5 right now, and not because of the string-of-pearls issue, but rather because I've been making more money with video vs. photos lately.