Originally posted by geko5766 I just came by and tumbled over this.
Can anybody please tell me, what this guy was pulling off?
I have never ever seen something similar to this, never heard so many repetitions in one single short-film. I donŽt know what pill he he had taken earliere this morning, but he definetely had not choosen the RED-one.
So he may live further in his MATRIX and he shall get happy with his NIKON. IŽll stay with my K5, which is definitvely much better in Autofocus and has a much better High-ISO capability than a Nikon 7000
Best from Germany
Georg
What's he pulling off? He is showing the world how much of an imbecile he is.
Lets see, where to begin...
Low ISO: The K5 is quite a bit better at low ISO according to DXO (about 1/5 stop), the D7000 is marginally (and you need to be splitting the hair mighty fine here) at high ISO.
It's interesting that he sloughs off the big advantage pentax has at low ISO and makes a hige deal about the very, very marginal, probably unnoticable, advantage the Nikon has at high ISO.
He then goes on to make a fool of himself with AF. Now, I'm sure that the D7000 may well be better than the K5, but the K5 AF is not merely a tweaked version of the K7.
In this he is (in my opinion) a bald faced liar. He's apparently never used a K5, or even looked through the viewfinder.
Anyway, the guy is proving that on the internet, anyone can be a horses ass.