Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
12-19-2010, 11:22 AM   #16
Veteran Member
falconeye's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Munich, Alps, Germany
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 6,863
QuoteOriginally posted by RawheaD Quote
The shot up there was taken with a Pentax 67II. 645 is the absolute minimum size for MF and there's currently only a $30,000 sensor that will take full advantage of that. 6x6 and larger film will have their place for a long time yet.
Thanks for the clarification.

12-26-2010, 10:36 AM   #17
Veteran Member
RawheaD's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: MA, USA
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 831
QuoteOriginally posted by nanok Quote
rawhead: lens, aperture, mate. you won't get away with it so easily, now that you posted that gorgeous picture. so, 6x7, ?lens?, ?aperture_shot_at? ? cheers

Sorry for the late reply. Pentax 67II + smc Pentax 105mm f2.4, shot wide open :-)
12-26-2010, 12:09 PM   #18
Loyal Site Supporter
Rupert's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Texas
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 25,000
Good conversation here, and meaningful to some more than others. For old Squirrel Shooters like me the K5 is going to open new doors and bring opportunities that have previously been impossible. While MF is great for many situations, it is no good for most Squirrel shooting...while the K5 is loaded with the features needed and the results will certainly satisfy even the most critical Squirrel eye. They are not much interested in Pixels....unless they are edible.
Best Regards!
12-28-2010, 11:58 AM   #19
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Mexico
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,125
QuoteOriginally posted by RawheaD Quote
Sure, you could approximate it. You could also approximate the beautiful bokeh of any lens; so why buy good fast lenses at all?? Being able to approximate something in digital != wanting to do it. I have nothing against people who do want to do that. I personally find it seriously un-fun to do that, when I can go out with my 67II and take pictures like that with one shutter depression :-)
And I find scanning film to be even more un-fun. Do what suits you.

Rob


Last edited by robgo2; 12-28-2010 at 12:14 PM.
12-31-2010, 07:12 PM   #20
Pentaxian
Clarkey's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brampton, ON, Canada
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,766
Intriguing thread. I still shoot 645, but find the barrier is now the digitization (I do not have an enlarger).
Apart from the 9000 and flatbeds like the high end epsons and microtek machines, there is not much happening in the way of new scanning tech coming to market. I always wonder if these comparisons (film v digital) are valid.

+1 on scanning film. Not fun, but more like a darkroom than plugging an SD card into a reader and tweaking in LR. I find it to be interesting, especially when scanning slide film. IMHO, the character can change significantly between mediums.
12-31-2010, 08:07 PM   #21
Veteran Member
JonPB's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 430
On a perhaps-unrelated note...

I think that it is a given that larger formats will produce shallower DOF. And digital is better for adapting to different white balances and gradients. And that the characters can change dramatically even with identical scenes, not only between film and digital but between different kinds of film. Personally, I enjoy shallow DOFs but mostly I'm interested in detail and dynamic range. (I like shooting city scenes at night. Something about artificial light gets me going. But it also gives my GX10 fits. Huzah for my K-5.) I enjoy pouring over an image, delving into it; I realize that most people look at art and it is their reaction in the first quarter-second that matters, but, if I don't mangle my French, c'est la vie. When that initial reaction is positive, there's a dwelling factor that I want to be able to entertain.

From the images posted here, I'd say that the digital camera outperforms the film in detail. Of course, that's from viewing crops on a monitor. If you have experience with film, do you think that film outperforms in viewing experience with a print?

What I'd love is to have a print from a film image to compare with a print from a digital image. I've seen lots of film prints in galleries, but that's a poor point of comparison. Ideally, the same scene captured with film and, say, a K-5, both printed at the same size, would be great. Does anyone have such files they'd be willing to share with me? I'd be happy to make prints--admittedly, they'd be 4x6 prints, both of the entire shot and equally cropped to look at the details--and send them back to the photographer after making my examination. The images can be rejects, ones that aren't valuable as images...I'm just curious to compare the two, if people think that film still exceeds digital in detail and dynamic range.

Feel free to PM me if you'd be willing to share a scanned image. Thank you!
01-01-2011, 07:54 AM   #22
Inactive Account




Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Brisbane, QLD, AUS
Posts: 3,262
QuoteOriginally posted by RawheaD Quote
Working with larger format film gives you one advantage that even the top-end medium format digital can't give you: the extreme shallow DoF.
Name me a dozen medium format lenses with apertures of f1.4 or greater.

I'll wait.
01-02-2011, 10:33 PM   #23
Veteran Member
Eruditass's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,206
QuoteOriginally posted by RawheaD Quote
Yeah, but let's see the K-5 (or any APS-C cam for that matter) take a shot like this:



Working with larger format film gives you one advantage that even the top-end medium format digital can't give you: the extreme shallow DoF.
The Brenizer Method Explained With Directions | San Francisco Lifestyle Wedding Photographer | Bay Area Wedding Photography

Yes, it's a pain.

Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
argentique, camera, dslr, euros, format, images, k-5, k-5 ii, k-5 iis, k5, pentax, pentax k-5
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Acquisto pentax negli Stati Uniti e garanzia Internazionale Mitch Photographic Technique 3 12-07-2010 03:16 AM
Back focus sur Pentax 50mm f:1.4 SMC FA loule Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 6 10-12-2010 08:57 AM
Split-image focussing screen BJ-61 for Pentax 67II phonoline Pentax Medium Format 4 09-24-2010 10:00 PM
Iniciacion y ayuda en la fotografia ASAHI PENTAX ESII matiwonko Welcomes and Introductions 1 07-15-2010 01:32 AM
Argentique sur pentas numérique Aarkhan Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 2 12-24-2009 11:20 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:02 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top