Originally posted by Rupert Why would I be willing to bet a nice sum that if that Poll (now closed) was more favorable to your argument that it would all of a sudden have much more statistical value to you? Everyone here with a K5 had a chance to answer that first question with a positive answer, yet they didn't? No matter the statistical validity of the Poll, that question and the responses had validity.
Well, you'd lose that nice sum, because I'm not making an argument. All I've done is try and demonstrate the logical wasteland some members are living in.
The whole point of statistical significance is that it exists whether the observer wants it to or not. Online polls are completely useless for bolstering anyone's argument - they simply don't mean anything, and no conclusions can be drawn from them.
I've never tried to tell anyone their problems don't exist, or are the result of user-error. What does drive me insane (and I confess, today more than most days, I don't usually get into these pissing matches) are people who have never touched the product in question repeating, over and over, the same baseless conclusions about quality control, design flaws, and Pentax's management techniques.